User talk:Loverdion

Your use of multiple Wikipedia accounts

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account, which contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Hernan 12, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and admit to it now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Michaelzeng7 (talk) 00:11, 18 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

As I told you we are an organization and there are a lost of members wanting this article. Hernan 12 is another user, who created the article. I'm the one who is here because of him. He told me that you are deleting the article. Please, what happen to people here? It seems like it's a dictatorship. Loverdion 21:21, 17 March 2013

March 2013

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. 5 albert square (talk) 01:03, 18 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

In reply to your question at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miley Cyrus International

You asked, "I red all the rules. And I followed them. This is not a promotional article. I just want to tell the history of MCI. What did I do wrong? Tell me and I'll change it...." Here are a few rules you seem to have missed:

The subject of an article must have received significant coverage from multiple independent reliable sources. See Wikipedia:Notability (summary).
Facts in an article must be verifyable by references to reliable sources, and the sources that verify the notability of the subject must be independent of the subject. See Wikipedia:Verifiability.

So what you did wrong is that you didn't include links to articles featuring MCI in reliable sources like The Times of London and The Washington Post. The only reference in your article was to MCI it self; so it doesn't demonstrate notability. —teb728 t c 04:56, 18 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]