User talk:Lovemeloveme247

March 2024

Hello, I'm Synorem. I wanted to let you know that I removed one or more external links you added to Baul because they seemed inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. Synorem (talk) 03:03, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Islamic culture. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Boyinaroom (talk) 09:28, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Cultural Muslims, you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Cultural Muslims was changed by Lovemeloveme247 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.851565 on 2024-03-24T09:56:04+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 09:56, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@ClueBot NG I'm sorry but how does it make a vandalism when I just fixed typos from "pew" to "few". Also culturally speaking, the majority of Bangladeshis are Bengalis. Bangladeshi is not an cultural identity Lovemeloveme247 (talk) 09:58, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Fasting in Islam, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fast. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@DPL bot Oh, thank you for letting me know. I'll work on it and will remember to not make the same mistake ever again. Lovemeloveme247 (talk) 12:56, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May 2024

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Bengali Hindus. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Ekdalian (talk) 08:50, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Ekdalian Oh it was not original research, it was written in one of the articles which was linked way before I edited so please do your proper research before consulting me. Lovemeloveme247 (talk) 12:54, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia article cannot be cited as a reliable source. You need to cite modern scholarly work by reliable authors. You need to follow our policies. Thanks. Ekdalian (talk) 17:52, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Ekdalian Maybe you didn't get it, cause I didn't cite any references from any source, including Wikipedia, if any Wikipedia article was cited, it was sited by someone else, I just added sentences based on those Lovemeloveme247 (talk) 01:32, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No, please don't. You have to cite proper reliable and verifiable source for each and every statement that you add, per WP:RS, WP:V. No assumption please! Otherwise, any unsourced content will be treated as original research! Thanks. Ekdalian (talk) 04:37, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Bengali cuisine, you may be blocked from editing.

Notice of discretionary sanctions

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in South Asian social groups. Due to past disruption in this topic area, the community has authorised uninvolved administrators to impose contentious topics restrictions—such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks—on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, expected standards of behaviour, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on these sanctions. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Ekdalian (talk) 04:41, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May 2024

You have recently made edits related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. This is a standard message to inform you that India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics.

Edits in this topic area are subject to sanctions due to frequent nationalist/regionalist WP:POVPUSH disruptions by editors. Your recent edits are contentious, be vary of the sanctions which may lead to editing restrictions such as blocks if WP:EDITWARRING or other types of disruption are perceived. Particularly this revert of yours, restoring two ([1], [2]) drive-by edits by IPs. Read WP:NPOV and WP:STABLE for why they were reverted. I will expand, GI tags are not the "be all end all" of the origin of items especially if restricted to national GI regimes as is the case here and also in this case WP:RS note different origin traditions of the dessert and these have been expanded upon in the body, we cannot insert the POV of one in the WP:LEAD over the other. Wikipedia is simply not the place for nationalist assertion. Gotitbro (talk) 15:45, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Gotitbro You've made a mistake, I didn't make a singular edit on anything about Afghanistan till now so before consulting me about my "POV" and topics on nationalism and if Wikipedia is suitable for this type of behaviour or not, please check your facts. Lovemeloveme247 (talk) 22:16, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I do not think you have understood how these sanctions apply. Please visit the above contentious topics policy page and read the rules. The sanctions are for India, Pakistan and Afghanistan and related topics i.e. South Asia broadly. They are named as such not because they are limited to these country-topics but because these were the topic areas most affected when the sanctions first came into force. They have since been expanded for broad application. Gotitbro (talk) 07:27, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

June 2024

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article. Ram1751 (talk) 02:45, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Ram1751 I always include links or reliable sources of my research and I don't believe I have ever included any original idea in any Wikipedia article. Lovemeloveme247 (talk) 04:46, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]