User talk:Loveableone

Hello, Loveableone! Welcome to Wikipedia! We're so glad you're here! If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills, the sandbox is for you. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! — Mikhailov Kusserow (talk) 14:18, 19 August 2009 (UTC) Getting started A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: edit a page • upload and use images Getting help Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Policies and guidelines Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The community Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Writing articles Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Pages needing attention • Peer review Miscellaneous User name • User pages • Talk pages Clean up: General - Spam - Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Bride Wars

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. Please remember to observe our core policies. Thank you. BOVINEBOY2008 17:48, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

Radio Songs

Please don't add this chart to song articles for the most part. Radio Songs is actually the Hot 100 Airplay chart, and since it's a component of the Hot 100, it should not be included unless the song didn't chart in the Hot 100 proper. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 18:21, 18 September 2009 (UTC)

Component Charts

Hello i've reverted your edits because ARIA Singles Charts is the only official Australian singles chart. It comprises of the Physical Chart + the Download Chart. That makes both the phsyical and download charts a component chart which according to WP:record charts should not be included. (Lil-unique1 (talk) 18:42, 22 September 2009 (UTC))

December 2009

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did to Already Gone (Kelly Clarkson song), you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Alan - talk 20:25, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

Images

Hi
You need to be more careful with your image uploads. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and that includes the usage of fair use images. As you know, I've previously removed the alleged cover image of Na Base do Beijo since despite an extensive search, I found no proof that this is the actual cover image and should thus be used in the article, or could be used under a valid fair use claim in accordance with our fair use policy. You now uploaded a new, different version of the cover image, with a source link that points to somewhere seemingly unrelated, so there still is no proof, and that it also of far too high resolution to comply with the policy.
You now have a history of problematic image uploads, please be more careful in the future. I admire your dedication, but we need to get it right, foremost.
In addition, could you please make sure to properly name your uploads in the future? Each and every image you uploaded has a superfluous space character right before the extension, just like your newest upload File:Nabasedobeijo .jpg.
Amalthea 02:11, 12 December 2009 (UTC)

Seriously:

1. Make sure your uploads don't have any stray spaces in their names, like with your newest upload File:Nickelback-Never-Gonna-Be-Alone .jpg
2. Make sure that a reliable source can confirm that you cover uploads are in fact official covers! Not all singles have cover images. Don't upload a random fan image you find on the web, it will have to be deleted, just like with your newest upload File:Nickelback-Never-Gonna-Be-Alone .jpg.

I expect you, as I said above, to be more careful with this in the future. Your whole page is full of deletion notifications, you are creating work for other editors here.
Regards, Amalthea 12:57, 19 December 2009 (UTC)

February 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Worth It (song). Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Elen of the Roads (talk) 22:35, 9 February 2010 (UTC)

All I Ever Wanted

Aspects (talk) has started a thread at Talk:All I Ever Wanted (album), thanks Tbfont color="#6082B6">hotch^{Talk2 Me} 17:56, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

Final warning

Can you provide a reliable source confirming that File:Never Gonna Be Alone.png is an official single cover for "Never Gonna Be Alone"? Otherwise I will have to remove it from the article and delete it.
Amalthea 18:08, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

Judging by your silence, you cannot. And I assume you also have nothing confirming File:Nabasedobeijo.jpg, correct? The source you listed leads to a different calendar/wallpaper image. And with File:One More Lie (Standing In The Shadows).png, you were quite certainly aware that the image was a fan-made cover image, the source you gave explicitly calls it that.

I've previously urged you twice to make sure that your single cover uploads are verifiable, the first time regarding just that "Na Base do Beijo" cover image. You apparently decided to ignore me, and make Wikipedia a less reliable source of information instead.
Consider this your last warning. I expect your image uploads to be flawless from now on. If you are unsure about an upload, ask me in advance! If in doubt, do not upload it. If you again choose to ignore this last warning, in particular by continuing to upload unverifiable or unofficial cover images of musical recordings in violation of both our policy on verifiability and on non-free content, I will begin a discussion on the administrators noticeboard on banning you from image uploads. You have proven time and again, despite multiple warnings, that you are unwilling or unable to follow our basic rules here.
Amalthea 08:29, 5 March 2010 (UTC)

Where are the reliable sources confirming that the following two images are indeed "official":

• File:Norah Jones - Young Blood (Official Single Cover).jpg
• File:Inevertoldyoucolbie.jpg

Amalthea 19:11, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

You're such a stupid idiot person, and YES!!

THE SINGLE COVERS ARE OFFICIAL AND I GAVE REFERENCES BUT YOU IGNORE EVERYONE.

AND YOU COULD NOT DELETE THE PAGE OF I NEVER TOLD YOU BECAUSE THE SONG IS ON THE CHARTS AND WAS RELEASED (AND I GAVE THE REFERENCE THAT THE SONG WAS RELEASED)!!

ABOUT YOUNG BLOOD IT IS GOING TO BE RELEASED, SO STOP OF BEING AN ASSHOLE AND LEAVE ME ALONE!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Loveableone (talk • contribs) 19:37, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

Please avoid personal attacks.
Concerning "Young Blood", one of the two sources was unreliable (a collection of user comments?), and the link to Norah Jones's official page didn't mention it being released as a single either.
Concerning "I Never Told You", as you are well aware the topic was discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/I Never Told You, where it was found to fail our inclusion guideline for songs. It still doesn't: being a released single does not make it pass WP:NSONGS, and being on one of the more obscure billboard charts doesn't either – the link you gave as a reference for the "Billboard Hot 100" chart doesn't work, acharts only confirms a "US Airplay Top 100" listing, but that chart provider even displays a little Wikipedia-"W" these days with a comment that Wikipedia editors don't find it an encyclopedic chart. Read WP:NSONGS.
Lastly and most importantly, no, neither of the two images has a reliable source confirming it. The Colbie Caillat image used to have three links, until you removed them earlier today, but they either were unreliable (two blogs) or didn't even show the image (the Amazon link). So I ask one last time, can you provide reliable sources confirming that the two images are official single covers, like you claimed? I assume you have found the Norah Jones cover somewhere, and I hope the above warning lead you to check whether it was official before uploading it?
Amalthea 20:10, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

I'm expecting an answer here. I've told you what will happen if you continue to upload fake single covers. The very least I expect to see from you is an acknowledgment of the problem, and a commitment to be extremely careful with image uploads from now on. Amalthea 21:55, 26 March 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Make My Heart

I have nominated Make My Heart, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Make My Heart. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Amalthea 18:21, 19 April 2010 (UTC)

OMG! I Can't believe that you are teasing me like that!!!! I GAVE THE RIGHT REFERENCES TO YOU!! THE MUSIC VIDEO PREMIERES!!! THE OFFICIAL COVER ART IS AVALIABLE ON AMAZON AND ITUNES!! WHAT DO YOU WANT MORE???????????????????

The Wikipedia community has set lower standards that need to be reached for songs to have standalone articles here. I have given you the link to that guideline a dozen times – I cannot help you if you do not read it.
Please follow this link: → WP:NSONGS ←. Read the "Albums, singles and songs" section.
In particular, it is consensus that a song should not have an article simply because it was declared a single.
Amalthea 18:55, 19 April 2010 (UTC)

Hits Daily Double

Hi there, I've noticed you've added sales from HDD to Pulse (Toni Braxton album). thanks for doing that. I normally do it but im very busy atm. im supposed to be on a wikibreak LOL. Just wanted to say that whenever you use HDD can you please archive the source first using WebCite otherwise the webpage changes each weak and its impossible to verify things. Its very easy all you do is in the first box insert the website you want to archive and then insert an email address in the second box and done. Don't worry your email is kept private its just that they email you the new link to use. if you could update the pulse source with an archived one and then in the future do it as well that would be brilliant. See Still Standing (Monica album) to see how you can use HDD to build a strong commericial performance section. Lil-unique1 (talk) 19:12, 21 May 2010 (UTC)

May 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Last of the American Girls, please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This is particularly important when adding or changing any facts or figures and helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Wikipedia:Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. --IllaZilla (talk) 17:36, 31 May 2010 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to Last of the American Girls. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. --IllaZilla (talk) 17:58, 31 May 2010 (UTC)

HEY, I'M OLD HERE, so don't tell me what to do!! AND WAS EDITING YET AND YOU JUST DELETE WHAT I DO!! I WAS GETTING THE REFERENCES AND YOU JUST THROW AWAY MY ARTICLE!!! AND YES!! I WAS ABOUT TO GAVE THE REFERENCES AND YOU TAKE IT!! Loveableone

Constructive contributions are appreciated and strongly encouraged, but your recent edit to the userpage of another user may be considered vandalism. In general, it is considered polite to avoid substantially editing others' userpages without their permission. Instead, please bring the matter to their talk page and let them edit their user page themselves if they agree on a need to do so. Please refer to Wikipedia:User page for more information on User page etiquette. Thank you. IllaZilla (talk) 23:05, 31 May 2010 (UTC)

June 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Bionic (Christina Aguilera album), please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This is particularly important when adding or changing any facts or figures and helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Wikipedia:Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Lil-unique1 (talk) 22:52, 24 June 2010 (UTC)

This is my page of Dynamite (Taio Cruz song)

"Loveableone"
Song

"Dynamite" is a song by British recording artist Taio Cruz. It was written by Cruz and Max Martin and produced by Dr. Luke and Benny Blanco. The song serves as the second U.S. single from the international edition of his sophomore album, Rokstarr. It was released as a digital download on May 30, 2010.

Release

After his #1 debut U.S. single hit, "Break Your Heart", the song was added to Top 40 radio stations on May 30, 2010. Later, it was released as a digital download on June 1, 2010.

Live Perfomances

Taio perfomed the song for the first time on Live with Regis & Kelly in June 9, 2010. Later, he went to Jimmy Kimmel Live in June 10, 2010.

Chart performance

It debuted at number 26 on the Billboard Hot 100 and at number 13 on the Digital Songs, selling 83,000 copies. It drop to number 49, but climbed to #31 on the latest week.

Chart (2010)	Peak Position
Canadian Hot 100	8
U.S. Billboard Hot 100	26
U.S. Billboard Digital Songs	13
U.S. Billboard Radio Songs	73

Release

After his #1 debut U.S. single hit, "Break Your Heart", the song was added to Top 40 radio stations on May 30, 2010. Later, it was released as a digital download on June 1, 2010.

Live Perfomances

Taio perfomed the song for the first time on Live with Regis & Kelly in June 9, 2010. Later, he went to Jimmy Kimmel Live in June 10, 2010.

Chart performance

It debuted at number 26 on the Billboard Hot 100 and at number 13 on the Digital Songs, selling 83,000 copies. It drop to number 49, but climbed to #31 on the latest week.

Chart (2010)	Peak Position
Canadian Hot 100	8
U.S. Billboard Hot 100	26
U.S. Billboard Digital Songs	13
U.S. Billboard Radio Songs	73

Brasil hot 100

is a bad chart -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 | talk2me 17:51, 13 September 2010 (UTC)

Make My Heart

Per the deletion discussions and per WP:NSONGS the song is not notable for its own page. -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 | talk2me 17:35, 6 December 2010 (UTC)

Proper citations

When you add information, as you did here, please can you make sure you fully fill out references using {{cite web}}. If you are unsure of how to use it check the template's page or have a look at how existing references are formatted and copy that. -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 ^[talk] 21:55, 6 January 2011 (UTC)

I've had to go through and correct you're citations again. Please can you make sure you format references properly. See the difference here. -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 ^[talk] 18:03, 13 January 2011 (UTC)

Problems with upload of File:Never Gonna Leave This Bed.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Never Gonna Leave This Bed.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 19:05, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

April 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Femme Fatale (Britney Spears album) has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Wikiproject Albums advises regarding the critical reception section to "consider the notability of the review source and keeping a neutral point of view". If you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. -- Dan56 (talk) 02:34, 6 April 2011 (UTC)

Copyrighted contributions

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions to the Multishow ao Vivo: Ivete Sangalo no Madison Square Garden article, but for legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later, and under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribute Share-Alike."

You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question at the "Help Desk". You can also leave a message on my talk page. Mr. Credible (talk) 18:28, 15 April 2011 (UTC)

Desejo de Amor

Desejo de Amor doesn't pass WP:NSONGS, because no one has demonstrated that it has charted on a reliable chart. top40-charts.com has a Brazil chart, but top40-charts.com is on WP:Record charts#Websites to avoid. If you can find a reliable source for Brazilian chart that isn't on WP:BADCHARTS or WP:Record charts#Websites to avoid, feel free to add the chart to the article and restore it. Until then, it fails to meet the criteria outlined at WP:NSONGS.—Kww(talk) 17:54, 18 April 2011 (UTC)

Feel free to take your discussion to WT:Record charts and try to get the guideline changed. top40-charts.com publishes a 20 position chart without any indication of where it comes from. It doesn't match the Billboard Brasil charts. It doesn't meet WP:RS. Remember WP:BURDEN: the material has been removed, and now it is your obligation to show that the material is reliable. Since it is obviously false, that will be hard to do.—Kww(talk) 18:45, 18 April 2011 (UTC)

I see that you have changed the source. Have you physically verified the magazine article?—Kww(talk) 18:48, 18 April 2011 (UTC)

I'd like a pointer to an official YouTube channel for Billboard Brasil. If I can verify that it's an official channel, it can be used to source some things that are hard to source today.—Kww(talk) 19:06, 18 April 2011 (UTC)

What makes you think that's an official channel, not just a fan?—Kww(talk) 19:58, 18 April 2011 (UTC)

WP:BADCHARTS

Please do not add the Euro 200, or any other chart listed at WP:BADCHARTS, to any Wikipedia articles. Thank you.—Kww(talk) 03:17, 29 May 2011 (UTC)

Review edits

Your recent edits to Here I Am (Kelly Rowland album) have been reverted. Tabloid publications such as Daily Express and Us Weekly are not considered professional review sources, so please do not add them. Consider notable music publications such as those listed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Albums/Review sites, or publications/sites used by Metacritic, which is more extensive (list). Dan56 (talk) 03:59, 22 July 2011 (UTC)

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for copyright violations. Looking over your talk page, I see a constant stream of image problems that I see no sign that you have ever addressed. With this edit, you have stepped into copyright violations, blatantly copying text from http://www.myspace.com/Maroon5/blog/544148136. Any admin can unblock you when you show that you have some understanding of WP:IUP, WP:NFCC, and WP:COPYRIGHT. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

—Kww(talk) 04:20, 1 September 2011 (UTC)

PLEASE, unblock me!! I did nothing wrong.. I always edited in the Wikipedia with the proposal of help to create and making the pages even better. About the Maroon 5's Moves Like Jagger page, something's wrong. Because the information that i add, was taken from the most trusted site of music Billboard. Please, unblock me!!!

Unblock me please

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Loveableone (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I did nothing wrong.. I always edited in the Wikipedia with the proposal of help to create and making the pages even better. I know that some singles covers were against some copyrights, but i always wanted to increase the pages and i'm learning better know. About the Maroon 5's Moves Like Jagger page, something's wrong. Because the information that i add, was taken from the most trusted site of music: Billboard, not the MySpace. http://www.billboard.biz/bbbiz/industry/record-labels/maroon-5-and-christina-aguilera-s-moves-1005334872.story Here is the link that i add the information. Please, unblock me!!!

Decline reason:

You've repeatedly violated Wikipedia's rules for uploading material which is protected by copyright, and your unblock request does not address this. Nick-D (talk) 01:07, 3 September 2011 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Loveableone (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I need to get back to edit in Wikipedia, because there was a missunderstood with the edit of Moves Like Jagger page.

Decline reason:

You are going to need to provide convincing evidence that you understand and will comply with Wikipedia's policies on copyright before you are unblocked. Nick-D (talk) 07:36, 3 September 2011 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Loveableone (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I know that there was a copyright violation on the text of the Moves Like Jagger page, even though i only cited the Billboard article. I only copy and paste, but i know that it was wrong and i'm asking to go back to edit on Wikipedia.

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your block told you to show understanding of three separate policies. Have you read any of them?—Kww(talk) 01:18, 3 September 2011 (UTC)

I know i don't understand so many wikipedia rules, but it was only a mistake.. Please take me back...

I'm not saying that you did it on purpose, I'm saying that until you understand those policies, you'll keep doing the same wrong things. Go read for a while, and come back when you think you understand them. Then we'll talk about why your edits to "Moves Like Jagger" were wrong. Then, we'll talk about unblocking you.—Kww(talk) 01:23, 3 September 2011 (UTC)

The mistakes that i made in Wikipedia wasn't so bad. The covers that i upload sometimes are official, but the main mistake is that the page of these songs are redirected. It means that the cover is orphaned, but it happens because of the redirection. About, the Moves Like Jagger, must be something wrong. I only add extra informations about the charts, taken exclusively by Billboard and i showed the right reference. So, i'm asking once again, please unblock me!

Your response shows that you haven't read the relevant policies. I'll give you a hint: it's the text that you added that was the problem. The text was a copyright violation. Now, go read those polices and explain why it was a problem and I'll unblock you. Don't keep adding unblock requests. The one that's in place put you on a list, and other admins are constantly reading your request. No one is granting it yet, though.—Kww(talk) 02:05, 3 September 2011 (UTC)

I need to say "According to Billboard" and i don't have to only copy, i have to take some part of the material and say with my own words.

Do not remove unblock requests as you did in this edit. If you continue down this path it's likely that your ability to edit this talk page will be turned off. Nick-D (talk) 23:27, 3 September 2011 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Loveableone (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I need to say "According to Billboard" and i don't have to only copy, i have to take some part of the material and say with my own words.

Accept reason:

A citation is enough, you don't always have to say "According to Billboard", but say with my own words is the important part, and you seem to understand that now.—Kww(talk) 23:52, 3 September 2011 (UTC)

Thank you so much for having me back. I learned a lot with the mistakes that i made and i'm promise to not let Wikipedia team down again...

File:Keri hilson feat nelly-lose control s.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Keri hilson feat nelly-lose control s.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Oz ^talk 21:01, 9 September 2011 (UTC)

Yeah its reliable for chart positions but sometimes they create fan-made covers. See S&M and Super Bass for example. Please find another reliable source other than Hung Medien that has that cover you uploaded. Oz ^talk 23:10, 11 September 2011 (UTC)

The Sea

Hi! Thanks for adding content to articles. But, please don't copy-paste from websites (as in this edit). It is copyright-violation. Thanks. Novice7 (talk) 12:00, 13 September 2011 (UTC)

Another one: [1]. Please don't copy-paste from website. Thanks. Novice7 (talk) 12:04, 13 September 2011 (UTC)

File:Moves-like-jagger-video.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Moves-like-jagger-video.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Saulo ^{Talk to Me} 22:11, 20 September 2011 (UTC)

File:Christina-aguilera-heart-crotch-blinking-01.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Christina-aguilera-heart-crotch-blinking-01.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Saulo ^{Talk to Me} 18:55, 23 September 2011 (UTC)

September 2011

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 6 months for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without verifying permission. You have been previously warned that this is against policy, but have persisted, as you did at File:Moves-like-jagger-video.jpg. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here Magog the Ogre (talk) 18:58, 27 September 2011 (UTC)}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Magog the Ogre (talk) 21:03, 25 September 2011 (UTC)

• The straw that broke the camel's back on this one was changing the attribution from Huffington Post (which clearly has a Getty images notice [2]) to your own camera. In other words, you lied. You're done. If you've grown up you can edit a half year from now. Magog the Ogre (talk) 21:05, 25 September 2011 (UTC)

• PLEASE, I'M BEGGING!! Take me back on Wikipedia. You cannot say that i lied if you can't confirm. I ALWAYS edit on Wikipedia and i help increase a lot many musical articles and this should be considered. And i don't need to spend six months away from Wikipeda to learn, because i know the truth. It's not fair and i read already many things on Wikipedia and i promise if i come back, i'm gonna spend at least one month away from uploading music video stills, but i can't live 6 months away from Wikipedia. It's not fair Magog the Ogre.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Loveableone (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

What happenned was a mistake. I take the picture from my own camera and i just gave the Huffington Post reference to became more trusted the article. Of course is was the same photo, but i'm not lying at all. And why do i need to spend six months away from Wikipedia? I always increase many music articles and this is not fair. User:Loveableone(talk) 14:56, 26 September 2011 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Looking at this talk page, I see scores of warnings about improperly uploaded non-free media, copyright policy violations, and so on. The example given by Magog above is blatant inappropriate behavior. "It's not fair" is not a reason to unblock you; indeed, it is fair because Wikipedia takes copyright infringement very seriously, and even your unblock request seems to show that you do not. --Kinu ^t/_c 18:19, 26 September 2011 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I have to concur with Kinu's analysis, and edit conflicted with their review. For reference, the relevant image was at File:Moves-like-jagger-video.jpg, and the relevant edit listed in the deleted edits for that image. The diff is dated 17:47, 21 September 2011. UltraExactZZ ^Said ~ Did 18:32, 26 September 2011 (UTC)

PLEASE, let me just edit the regular articles about music and upload only single/album covers. And just block me on the MUSIC VIDEO STILLS. I'M BEGGING.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Loveableone (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Let me back to edit here!! I know the mistakes that i made, but i also made a lot of useful contributions that it had to be considered in my favor. All that i ask is to give me ONE LAST CHANCE and that I WILL NOT upload images of music videos. Only edit regular pages of music and upload ONLY TRUSTABLE SINGLES OR ALBUMS COVERS. User:Loveableone (talk) 15:28, 27 September 2011 (UTC)

Decline reason:

In a previous request, you said, I take the picture from my own camera and i just gave the Huffington Post reference to became more trusted the article. Of course is was the same photo, but i'm not lying at all. -- well, yes you are. You lied when you put a false reference on an article, or you'relying about it being your own picture. I don't see any benefit to Wikipedia to unblocking you. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 19:21, 27 September 2011 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

To be blunt, you're coming across as a child to me. I would ask you to give your age, except that it's frowned upon (so you don't need to say it here). I cannot think of any other way to explain how you would think you could get away with an obvious lie.

To the reviewing administrator: you may want to take the user's age into consideration when thinking about the fairness of the block (and the differing abilities of children to understand the reasons behind a punishment and how to react to it; I realize blocking policy prohibits this type of thinking, strictly speaking; but fairness and protecting Wikipedia are more closely intertwined than most people may realize). To do so, you may need to communicate with the user by email. Magog the Ogre (talk) 18:46, 27 September 2011 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Who-s-laughing-now-video.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Who-s-laughing-now-video.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Mosmof (talk) 01:49, 26 September 2011 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Loveableone for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Magog the Ogre (talk) 10:09, 27 October 2011 (UTC)

OMG!! I don't have nothing to do with this case. I use the internet from my school, that's why I use a public computer and many people here also have Wikipedia accounts and the people are messing around with these accusations. 23:49, 30 October 2011 (UTC)

After all, i learned with everything and I'm asking to come back here on the Wikipedia. Please!

Orphaned non-free image File:Moves-Like-Jagger-Official-Single-Cover.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Moves-Like-Jagger-Official-Single-Cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 17:33, 27 November 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Hearts don't lie.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Hearts don't lie.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:01, 23 July 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Sex therapy CD.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Sex therapy CD.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 08:19, 23 August 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Gabriella Cilmi - On a Mission.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Gabriella Cilmi - On a Mission.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 14:39, 23 August 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:I-will-love-again-cd2.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:I-will-love-again-cd2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 00:37, 30 November 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Jessie-j-who's-laughing-now.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Jessie-j-who's-laughing-now.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:30, 19 January 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Moves-Like-Jagger-Official-Single-Cover.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Moves-Like-Jagger-Official-Single-Cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:37, 19 January 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Lara-fabian-i-am-who-i-am.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Lara-fabian-i-am-who-i-am.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:17, 8 June 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Allhookedup .JPEG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Allhookedup .JPEG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:26, 6 March 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Deixo for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Deixo is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deixo until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Boleyn (talk) 14:51, 15 August 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Saiditalldvd .JPEG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Saiditalldvd .JPEG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:59, 23 September 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Mclfy-that's-the-truth-cd2.jpg

The file File:Mclfy-that's-the-truth-cd2.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Using more than one cover art not compliant with WP:NFCC#3a. Preferring the very top image by default...

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 20 November 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Colbiefallinforyou .JPEG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Colbiefallinforyou .JPEG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:09, 18 April 2022 (UTC)