User talk:LouiseSheffield

This is LouiseSheffield's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tropical Butterfly House, Wildlife & Falconry Centre (March 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gbawden was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tropical Butterfly House, Wildlife & Falconry Centre and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Gbawden (talk) 12:58, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! LouiseSheffield, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Gbawden (talk) 12:58, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by LouiseSheffield was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to the submission and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

LouiseSheffield (talk) 13:08, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Gbawden, thank you for checking my submission so quickly. Could you please advise which sections are a violation of Wikipedia's terms, and I will remove them, no problem. I have attempted to create it based just on the facts, it is not meant to be an advertisement. Kindest Regards, LouiseSheffield (talk) 13:08, 7 March 2017 (UTC)Louise[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Tropical Butterfly House, Wildlife & Falconry Centre has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Tropical Butterfly House, Wildlife & Falconry Centre. Thanks! SwisterTwister talk 15:29, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Tropical Butterfly House, Wildlife & Falconry Centre has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Tropical Butterfly House, Wildlife & Falconry Centre. Thanks! SwisterTwister talk 04:48, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest

Hello, LouiseSheffield. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about in the article Draft:Tropical Butterfly House, Wildlife & Falconry Centre, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:

avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the {{request edit}} template);
when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. Velella ^{Velella Talk} 12:11, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tropical Butterfly House, Wildlife & Falconry Centre (March 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Velella was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please re-read the comments by Gbawden which remain highly relevant. I have doubts whether this centre is notable, but I do know that most of the content is non-encyclopaedic and advertorial. It also deeply concerns me that the author and sole editor has a very strong conflict of interest as marketing manager for the centre

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tropical Butterfly House, Wildlife & Falconry Centre and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Velella ^{Velella Talk} 12:28, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tropical Butterfly House, Wildlife & Falconry Centre (April 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Curb Safe Charmer was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This still reads like an advertisement. The references provided don't establish notability, in my view. This appears to be a zoo, going about its business of being a zoo, and secondarily raising some money for conservation causes. Should all 10,000 zoos in the world be included in Wikipedia? No, just the notable ones. What makes this zoo stand out as being one of the few that should be included? That is not clear to me.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tropical Butterfly House, Wildlife & Falconry Centre and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 20:45, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Tropical Butterfly House, Wildlife & Falconry Centre concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Tropical Butterfly House, Wildlife & Falconry Centre, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:34, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Tropical Butterfly House, Wildlife & Falconry Centre

Hello, LouiseSheffield. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Tropical Butterfly House".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. TKK! bark with me! 19:15, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]