User talk:Loudsheer

Welcome!

Hello, Loudsheer, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Kulinism did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Introduction tutorial
Contributing to Wikipedia
How to edit a page
Introduction to referencing
Help pages
Simplified Manual of Style
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need personal help ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome. Ekdalian (talk) 07:19, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Editing/reverting without edit summary

Hello Loudsheer, I could see from your contributions that you have reverted edits of other users without any edit summary. This is not acceptable here unless the edit being reverted is pure vandalism. As a new user, you should be more careful and provide proper edit summaries for all your edits. Happy editing! Ekdalian (talk) 07:30, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, can a Ip user remove sourced content without checking the source? Loudsheer (talk) 10:47, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There's hardly any difference between an IP editor and a new editor. Even as experienced editors, we are supposed to provide edit summaries for such reverts! Ekdalian (talk) 15:02, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

May 2023

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Kulinism, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. I had clearly asked you to mention page number and quote; you seem to have ignored the edit summary and engaged in edit war. Ekdalian (talk) 14:50, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of discretionary sanctions on caste articles

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in South Asian social groups. Due to past disruption in this topic area, the community has authorised uninvolved administrators to impose discretionary sanctions—such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks—on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, expected standards of behaviour, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on these sanctions. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

-- Ekdalian (talk) 14:56, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Nobita456 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Nobita456. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

-- RoySmith (talk) 13:42, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@RoySmith this block is for? I dont have any other account! Ekdalian accused me of POV, may I ask you if I was pushing POV why Abecedare wrote this? Loudsheer (talk) 15:25, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Would request you to check Bishonen and Kulinism talk page, and please see where I gave fringe sources? as accused by Ekdalian. Loudsheer (talk) 15:28, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@RoySmithcock sucker, who made you Wikipedia admin? Loudsheer (talk) 21:33, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

co*k sucker Loudsheer (talk) 21:34, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]