User talk:Lotowinner

Welcome

Hello, Lotowinner, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your edits have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and have been reverted. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Technopat (talk) 00:32, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings

Greetings Lotowinner - thanks for the message you left on my talk page. This place can certainly be confusing at times, especially when other editors slap unexpected templates on article you have created. Please don't take it personally, because it is simply basic maintenance procedure. However, please have a look at Citing sources above, and if you have time, a couple of other things just to get the hang of it. In the meantime, I will put a different tag on the article you created to give you a bit of extra time to find/add those sources. Happy editing! Cheers! --Technopat (talk) 00:49, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for message. I have moved the references you put at the top of the page onto the discussion page, pending incorporation into article if relevant. The first one was good, and I have added it to the article, but I haven't had time to check the others yet. And as I have to spend the rest of the afternoon finishing my tax declaration, I won't be able to get round to it till tomorrow. In case you aren't yet sure how to use them, choose the sentence to reference, leave the cursor flashing there and click the <ref></ref> in the wiki markup box under the text box, move the cursor to the centre of that and then click the []. Paste the website url between the brackets and add the article title and name of newspaper. The important thing is to get those inline citations in there quickly. They can be perfected later. BTW, your message on my talk page was correctly posted (but don't use caps - they are the internet equivalent of shouting and some more sensitive souls might take exception to them). Happy editing! --Technopat (talk) 12:47, 23 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Paintbrush

{{helpme}} Lotowinner (talk) 20:03, 10 September 2010 (UTC)lotowinner i would like to ask a question about the box with the paintbrush that appears under external links on the Hard (music festival). Could you let me know what links you are speaking of and how i can edit that portion of the page. I cant see any external links. Any thoughts advice feedback is greatly appreciated. Thank you kindly. Lotowinner (talk) 20:06, 10 September 2010 (UTC)lotowinner[reply]

That message appeared because of the code {{External links|date=August 2010}}.

As there were no external links, I removed it (and I removed the empty section heading). Chzz ► 20:14, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I had a look through the history, and I found that it was added here on 20 Jult 2010 by Hippychickali (talk · contribs) - and there were no external links, so I don't know why they added it; you could always ask them on their talk page. Chzz ► 20:21, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Hard (music festival), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page James Murphy (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:27, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Destructo (dj) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Destructo (dj) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Destructo (dj) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Dennis Brown (talk) 21:26, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

June 2012

Hello, Lotowinner. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Hard (music festival), you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Dori ☾Talk ⁘ Contribs☽ 01:39, 21 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:27, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]