User talk:Lordpook

Image copyright problem with Image:Brychonenko2.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Brychonenko2.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:23, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Bryukhonenko.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Bryukhonenko.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:59, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Bryukhonenko2.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, File:Bryukhonenko2.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 09:03, 3 January 2009 (UTC) --Magog the Ogre (talk) 09:03, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Short interview?

Hi, I'm Eryk from the Wiki Education Foundation. I happened to notice the really great work you did on the Kea Tawana article! I wondered if you'd be interested in sharing some of your experiences working on this site for our blog? I'd like to write a short post about students who have added content about women artists to Wikipedia. I see you're a grad student-- are you instructing courses or helping as a TA? (It's fine if you are!)

We could use your real name or your Wikipedia username. We find students in particular like to participate since it gives them a pretty positive search result related to the field they're studying in. If you have a minute, you can drop me an e-mail at eryk@wikiedu.org, mention your username and what course you were in, and answer any of the following questions, and I'd be excited to get some attention directed toward your good work.

What are your goals (career or academics wise?)
Did you have any experience with Wikipedia before the class started? What did you think of Wikipedia before you started work on this assignment?
How did you find the process of writing a Wikipedia article, compared to if you had written a traditional paper on the topic?
Were you or your class aware that many women artists, and women in general, don't have Wikipedia entries? Did that encourage you in any way?
Do you think you'll come back to Wikipedia now that the course is finished?

Thanks for your time! Eryk (Wiki Ed) (talk) 18:29, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]