User talk:Lordofmisrule2
Stan Shaffer
[edit]Hello There!!!
Please do not remove the tags without rectifying the error for which it has been placed. In context to the said article, there is no references which may be verifiable.
Anyone can create a website or pay to have a book published, then claim to be an expert in a certain field. For that reason, self-published books, newsletters, personal websites, open wikis, blogs, forum postings, and similar sources are largely not acceptable. Self-published material may, in some circumstances, be acceptable when produced by an established expert on the topic of the article whose work in the relevant field has previously been published by reliable third-party publications. However, caution should be exercised when using such sources: if the information in question is really worth reporting, someone else is likely to have done so.
Self-published sources should never be used as third-party sources about living persons, even if the author is a well-known professional researcher or writer; see WP:BLP#Reliable sources.
Articles and posts on Wikipedia may not be used as sources.
Please click [[1]] for more info.
I hope this will help.
Hitrohit2001 (talk) 16:32, 3 July 2008 (UTC)Hitrohit2001
Stan Shaffer
[edit]Hello!!! I have removed the tag from the article created by you. I think the sources mentioned there is well verified.
happy editing!!!!
Hitrohit2001 (talk) 18:10, 3 July 2008 (UTC)Hitrohit2001
You Should Have Been With Me
[edit]
A tag has been placed on "You Should Have Been With Me", requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the article and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.
Hitrohit2001 (talk) 11:49, 3 July 2008 (UTC)Hitrohit2001
Proposed deletion of "You Should Have Been With Me"
[edit]
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article "You Should Have Been With Me", suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. --lifebaka (Talk - Contribs) 12:48, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
Welcome!
[edit]
|
