User talk:Lord and Sovereign of Truth

January 2016

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Richard Lynn has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Richard Lynn was changed by Lord and Sovereign of Truth (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.881093 on 2016-01-06T06:40:16+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 06:40, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not blank pages, as you did to User:Miradre/Nations_and_intelligence with this edit, because it is considered vandalism; instead, use the sandbox for testing. If you think the page should be deleted, see here for what to do. Thank you. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 06:41, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This page is being used as the source to insert racist pseudoscience into the Nations and intelligence page, which I have nominated for deletion, since I thought the encylopedia was not the place to spread fringe, discredited race science as if it was fact. Besides, there are already multiple pages on this topic: Race and Intelligence, History of the race and intelligence controversy, Scientific Racism. This page was only created to promote the fringe theories of pseudoscientist Richard Lynn, and to allow erroneous content to be inserted into the encylopedia that would not be allowed on the other pages. Please help. Lord and Sovereign of Truth (talk) 06:45, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nations and intelligence

You have it on AFD, no need to bulk delete sections. Jim1138 (talk) 08:34, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

See wp:BRD You've been bold, you have been reverted. Discuss in talk before removal. Thank you Jim1138 (talk) 08:40, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Jim, I suggest you read the rest of that article more carefully. It may have a thin veneer of being sourced and intelligible, but the prose is extremely ungrammatical and unreadable and unlikely to have been originally written in English, and the theories are extremely fringe. Have a closer look and you will see what I mean. I'm not the only one who has noticed this, look someone else hung a "please copy-edit" tag on the article. But the prose is too full of nonsense to be salvaged.Lord and Sovereign of Truth (talk) 08:45, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Nations and intelligence, you may be blocked from editing. Jim1138 (talk) 08:54, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is your final warning. You may be blocked from editing without further notice the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Nations and intelligence. Jim1138 (talk) 08:56, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Jimbo, I ask again: how much of that article have you actually read? It's barely readable chinese prose ungrammatically translated into english with no discernible point other than to make undefensible racist claims. Lord and Sovereign of Truth (talk) 08:58, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 09:21, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Lord and Sovereign of Truth (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was attempting to bring attention to an obvious HOAX PAGE Nations and intelligence. Please read some of the text: "The first attempt to estimate IQ score among nations across the world has been the 2002 book IQ and the Wealth of Nations by Richard Lynn and Tatu Vanhanen. IQ estimates in that book has been updated and validated by international student assessment studies in works by themselves and others (see #Studies of national cognitive ability)." There are multiple egregious grammatical errors in that one sentence alone, and a sweeping conclusion on the basis of ZERO references. The article was not written in English, is an obvious hoax, where it is not a hoax it merely repeats information debunking this fraud on the Race and Intelligence page, or the History of the Race and Intelligence Controversy pages. Please delete that HOAX PAGE! Restore my speedy request and root out racism from Wikipedia! It is outrageous that this article is being allowed to stand! It is obvious patent nonsense not written in English! Have any of you actually read the page? Almost 0 of the sentences are grammatical English. Unless someone wants to go through it and line edit each one to translate it from the garbled Chinese to English while deleting the unsourced racist opinions it contains masquerading as science by appealing to long-refuted pseudoscientific authors, that article needs to go! For the good of the encyclopedia, friends!

Decline reason:

Whatever you think of the article, edit warring to keep reinstating a speedy deletion request is extremely disruptive and not the way to go about it. You might have concluded that it is a hoax, but that speedy deletion criterion is only for hoaxes that are obvious to a non-expert who has not studied the article in detail. The correct forum now is the AfD discussion you have started, and with a calm and civil discussion rather than outraged protest and lots of exclamation marks. Please bear that in mind if you wish to make a new unblock request. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 10:10, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Also, looking a little more closely at your contributions so far, I come across comments like "All I know is that the second I nominated their ridiculous obvious hoax nonsense article for deletion, these two goose-stepping frauds try to have me banned from the encyclopedia. THEY should be banned. They are using the encylopedia as a place to disseminate their neo-nazi ideology" (at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/World Champion Editor). Personal attacks like that are absolutely prohibited here. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 10:48, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Perhaps they are, but are not WP:HOAX articles filled with pseudoscientific fake references and garbled English with multiple grammatical errors per sentence also absolutely prohibited? Aren't you concerned at all about that article's presence here? I challenge you to actually read the whole thing and tell me it belongs in the encylopedia and is actually a competent piece of prose (even leaving aside the lack of real referencing, pseudoscience,long discredited hoax aspect.) instead of reading up on my contributions, just read the article itself. I'm not the one who hung the copy-editing needed tag on it. The article is I unreferenced, ungrammatical patent nonsense by a non-English speaker. Please read it. World Champion Editor (talk) 11:58, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  - I'm specifically not reading the article as I wish only to act in an admin capacity and that precludes making any judgment about the article contents. My only interest here is in your behaviour in pursuing your goals and to prevent your abuse of process and of other editors. Oh, and by the way, you forgot to log out of World Champion Editor and back into Lord and Sovereign of Truth before commenting here - but never mind, I've blocked that one now for obvious abuse of multiple accounts. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 14:18, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]