User talk:LordOfPens

Your edit to Canada.

Thank you for experimenting with the page Canada on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. · AO ^Talk 08:23, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Serena Williams

It appears that I was mistaken regarding the proper format to be used in possessives. I apologize for the misunderstanding. Helmut von Moltke (talk) 15:14, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Apostrophes

Please discontinue your widespread changing of possessive apostrophes without discussing it with other uses. Instances such as Gates', James', and Williams' are all correct and shouldn't be changed from one style to another. Please also pay attention to official names. Thanks. Nihlus 19:02, 13 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, but I am aware of the MOS. I have heard each of those without the additional ɪz sound at the end and with it. Neither is wrong; but there is no reason to mass change them without discussion. Nihlus 19:20, 13 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, LordOfPens. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Tesla Model 3

It is nice that you want to help out the encyclopedia with proper grammar but your changes to the Model 3 article such as going from "standard battery model" to "standard-battery model" is not correct. Please focus on something else. --Frmorrison (talk) 23:05, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"standard-battery model" is correct; "standard battery model" is incorrect.

"standard" is an adjective, "battery" is a noun, and "model" is a noun. "battery" is used as a noun adjunct for the noun "model", and when used together, it would be "battery model". However, we have an additional modifier (the adjective "standard") that modifies the noun adjunct specifically - not the root noun - which requires a hyphen in-between. This is an example of a compound modifier that modifies a noun.

Here are some examples of compound modifiers:

standard-battery model (a model of something that is of a standard battery)

standard battery model (a battery model that is used as an industry standard, e.g. a Matlab standard model of a lithium-ion battery)

long-term contract (a contract that is effective over a long term)

long term contract (a term contract that is lengthy)

zero-liability protection (protection against all liabilities)

zero liability protection (no liability protection)

man-eating shark (a shark that eats men)

man eating shark (a man in the process of eating a shark)

concealed-weapons permit (a permit that allows for carrying concealed weapons)

concealed weapons permit (a concealed permit for carrying weapons)

Springfield has little-town charm (a town called Springfield has a type of charm commonly known as "little town")

Springfield has little town charm (a town called Springfield has low amounts of "town charm")

For more examples, please perform a web search for "compound modifier".

LordOfPens (talk) 00:38, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries

Thank you for your edits at Volkswagen emissions scandal. When you make changes, can you also summarise your change in the 'summary' text box. This makes it much easier to verify your changes. Thank you. Stepho talk 20:57, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

June 2018

Please stop moving articles to hyphenated names without discussion. The policy is at WP:COMMONNAME. --David Biddulph (talk) 15:21, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. If you have international boards setting standards for naming, they likely know better than you. Walter Görlitz (talk) 15:30, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

November 2018

Just like those people told you in July, please stop moving pages to hyphenated names without discussion. The terms "public domain" and "free software" are not hyphenated. lethargilistic (talk) 16:25, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I support the changes in question. They bring the articles into conformance with MOS:HYPHEN and common English and thus improve the articles.

The WP:DRN case is premature, in my opinion, as there are lots of people on the talk page for MOS that are deeply interested in hyphens and have lots of opinions and arguments on the subject that could well change one or another disputant's minds on this issue, so it ought to be discussed there.

(But from what I read at DRN, the heart of the dispute might be not hyphenation rules, but what constitutes a proper noun or a name - no matter, the same MOS people have a lot to say about those things). Bryan Henderson (giraffedata) (talk) 23:08, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion about this has been started on the Manual Of Style talk page.

Bryan Henderson (giraffedata) (talk) 23:23, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Dispute resolution noticeboard discussion

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding your pattern of moving pages to add hyphenation without discussion. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. The thread is "Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard#User talk:LordOfPens". Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, LordOfPens. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:09, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:40, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:16, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]