User talk:Looper72

February 2012

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Webshots, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found here. Kangaroopowah 04:50, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, talk pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments, as you did at Talk:Webshots, is considered bad practice, even if you meant well. Even making spelling and grammatical corrections in others' comments is generally frowned upon, as it tends to irritate the users whose comments you are correcting. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 05:04, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Webshots with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Jim1138 (talk) 05:18, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Webshots

Please discuss it in talk:Webshots before removing it from the article. Please do not remove section from talk. Jim1138 (talk) 05:20, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The key word here is remove, but it's not nice to others to insert your own text or otherwise modify their comments. There are only a few exceptions to this rule, none of which applies here.Jasper Deng (talk) 06:19, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
It is factually inaccurate to be portraying Webshots as engaged in malware and there are many references that are irrelevant. The page needs sections removed and portions cleaned up.Looper72 (talk) 06:34, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Regardless of the "correctness" (you have to discuss that) of those comments, you may not delete or edit them, period.Jasper Deng (talk) 06:35, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring on Webshots

Both you and Jlascar should discuss the edits on the article talk page rather than edit warring over it, even if this doesn't actually break WP:3RR. If you two don't compromise, then how is the edit warring going to stop?--Jasper Deng (talk) 19:24, 5 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Jasper, I have made repeated efforts to compromise and arrive at a concise wikipedia entry. He continues to push against a NPV Looper72 (talk) 21:12, 5 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Doesn't seem like you two have discussed sufficiently on the article talk page; without a true compromise neither of you will be satisfied. Edit warring shouldn't be done regardless of whether you think you're right, because he also thinks he's right, and therefore nothing productive occurs.--Jasper Deng (talk) 23:54, 5 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kiwee Toolbar

The article Kiwee Toolbar has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Old page about a non-notable toolbar extension. References refer to how to remove it but no in-depth coverage or any new information about it.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jip Orlando (talk) 14:45, 19 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]