User talk:LooneyGeoffrey

Hello, LooneyGeoffrey! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already loving Wikipedia you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Happy editing! (aeropagitica) 17:39, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Wikipedia Tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Fair use • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Pages needing attention • Peer review Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Images

Take a look at Help:Contents/Images and media and Special:Upload for image upload advice. (aeropagitica) 17:39, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vadilsm on you user page

Some people have been vandalizeing your user page, please note that. Vandilsm recently done by a IP adress, good luck on you user page, I will help when I can. Drestros power 20:56, 19 April 2007 (UTC)Drestros power[reply]

HIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Bogbuster (talk • contribs).

WHY?

I have reverted your edits to your talk page, then reverted myself (Almost breaching WP:3RR!) As I think you have full right to put stuff on your talk page, even if it is messed up stuff. I just want to ask, why would you blank your talk page?--Elfin341 00:55, 12 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

THIS IS MY USER PAGE, AND BOGBUSTER IS MY FRIEND! HE WAS JUST TRYING TO LEAVE A MESSAGE! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by LooneyGeoffrey (talk • contribs).

Elfin: reverting yourself negates both reverts in terms of 3RR: 3RR is just to prevent edit warring. You can't edit war with yourself. So don't worry. :) Nihiltres^(t.c.s) 01:15, 12 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't remove user warning messages

I used a number of user warnings on your "friend" Bogbuster - please don't remove them from the page as you have, this is generally considered inappropriate. Nihiltres^(t.c.s) 01:13, 12 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

LooneyGeoffrey, your repeated removal of talk coming to you and your friend Bogbuster is somewhat disruptive, especially in the case of removing user warnings and comments sent to you. Please don't remove notices and comments from other users. See also the talk page guidelines. Nihiltres^(t.c.s) 13:51, 12 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your user page comments

I along with others have issues with the religious comments you have made on your page, and they have been removed as per WP:USER#What can I not have on my user page? Please avoid divisive statements unrelated to Wikipedia issues. Phony Saint 18:56, 12 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. If you continue to make personal attacks, you will be blocked for disruption. This is not even close to being acceptable. Metros232 18:58, 12 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

LooneyGeoffrey, your actions are also being discussed on AN/I, just to let you know. Phony Saint 19:02, 12 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to make personal attacks on other people as you did at User:LooneyGeoffrey, you will be blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Thank you. Cool Blue^{talk to me} 19:40, 12 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia for a period of 31 hours as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our neutral point of view policy will not be tolerated. Metros232 19:41, 12 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This user is a confirmed sock puppet of Bogbuster, as established by CheckUser.
Please refer to this checkuser request page for further information.

Account information: contribs — page moves — all logs — block log — sock master userpage.

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

LooneyGeoffrey (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

68.9.66.162 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

{{SockpuppetCheckuser-nb|Bogbuster|Bogbuster}} ckeckuser block

Blocking administrator: Lucasbfr (talk • blocks)

Decline reason: You're not autoblocked. MaxSem 15:35, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why block me? Im not Bogbuster. Can you prove I am, despite the fact that I defend my friend even if he did wrong? Im very defensive towards my friend. Like I said before, can you prove Im Bogbuster?

Yes I can. Can you prove the contrary? MaxSem 15:35, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thats no proof at all! Its some idiot saying he suspects! THATS THE KEY WORD! SUSPECTS! Damn, people on this site are so damn stupid! Im laughing here cause your so stupid! I REALLY DON'T CARE ANYMORE! That was no proof whatsoever! Then I guess your a "Sockpuppet" of CapDac or whatever. Can you proove the contrary?

You might have missed that key word there: "confirmed." Not "suspected," "confirmed." That means it's true based on the data that they have access to. Metros 20:58, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, it is not confirmed. You have no proof. Thats bullshit. Unfortunately, you have made a mistake. And I really don't care anymore, because the people who edit this website are ASSHOLES who have no lives whatsoever! I just wanted to research articles, but because of your terrible edits, I wanted to make a better one. Only God and myself know that Im not a "sockpuppet" or whatever of Bogbuster. I've even left him a warning before for crying out loud! jeez, you people are so stupid, Im laughing while I type this! The joke is on you now. Go get lives! Cause all of you honstly suck! By the way, Im sure you all have friends on this website! So i guess that means you are also Sockpuppets! Proove me wrong!