User talk:Loo Junyuan10

March 2013

Hello, I'm Touch Of Light. Your recent edit to the page Roberto Baggio appears to have added incorrect information, so I removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Touch Of Light (Talk / Contributions) 08:55, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Loo Junyuan10, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Loo Junyuan10! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Nathan2055 (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:15, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Petr Čech, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. C 679 14:40, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

May 2013

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Xavi because it did not appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Materialscientist (talk) 10:26, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Zlatan Ibrahimović, you may be blocked from editing. Alexf^(talk) 10:40, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edits to Roberto Baggio

Hello, and thank you for your recent contributions. I appreciate the effort you made for our project, but unfortunately I had to undo your edit(s) becausethey were in front of an existing reference that doesn't support the change Feel free to contact me directly if you have any questions. Thank you! Flat Out let's discuss it 10:02, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

October 2013

This is your last warning. The next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at José Mourinho, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Mattythewhite (talk) 12:09, 5 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Alex Ferguson. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 12:15, 5 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

We seem to have a problem here. You keep violating the Neutral Point of View Policy in footballers articles, even though you have been warned against it. In fact, a last warning was given to you two days ago. Technically your account can be now blocked for violating policy after repeated warnings. Looking over your edits, I see that you seem not to be willingly trying to circumvent policy but might be somehow misguided or not reading your notices. Instead of blocking your account outright, I am giving you this chance to discuss it here and try to explain to you what the policy is and for you to explain yourself. This is what we are going to do: Please go and read the Neutral point of View policy in detail. Please do not make any more edits until you have read and explained your reasoning and your understanding of what you have read. Ask any questions you like, but do not edit live articles until we had a chance to discuss this. If you want, you can also ask a the Teahouse as per the invitation you received above. Should you add any more POV to articles without discussing here, be warned your account will be blocked from editing. We are listening. Please come and talk to us. -- Alexf^(talk) 11:28, 7 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Johnny Depp. Your edits have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. Widr (talk) 11:48, 7 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Pains me to do this, but I warned you at 11:28 UTC and 5 minutes later you completely disregarded and vandalized again. Sorry to see you go. I thought you could be a good editor and help us build this encyclopedia. My mistake. Never mind. -- Alexf^(talk) 11:55, 7 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Alexf^(talk) 11:52, 7 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]