User talk:Longway22

Welcome!

Hello, Longway22, and welcome to Wikipedia! While efforts to improve Wikipedia are always welcome, unfortunately your contributions are not written in an English that is good enough to be useful. You appear to be more familiar with Chinese; did you know there is a Wikipedia in Chinese? You may prefer to contribute there instead. In any case, welcome to the project, and thank you for your efforts! If you need help, please feel free to notify me on my talk page. -Lemonaka‎ 17:02, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

您好，Longway22。歡迎來訪英文版的維基百科！雖然我們隨時歡迎您在英文版維基百科編輯，但是您執筆所使用的英文可能並未達到英文版維基百科所需求的水準。若是您不介意的話，您可以在中文維基百科進行編輯。最後，感謝您參加維基百科。

您好，Longway22。欢迎来访英文版的维基百科！虽然我们随时欢迎您在英文版维基百科编辑，但是您执笔所使用的英文可能并未达到英文版维基百科所需求的水准。若是您不介意的话，您可以在中文维基百科进行编辑。最后，感谢您参加维基百科。 -Lemonaka‎ 17:02, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

August 2018

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Guangzhou. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. CaradhrasAiguo (leave language) 01:34, 19 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Theatres in Canton

A tag has been placed on Category:Theatres in Canton requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 05:33, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your report at Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism

I have reverted your report at Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism. This is the English Wikipedia. It is run completely separately from the Chinese Wikipedia. Administrators here have no authority over the Chinese Wikipedia. Please do not repeat this. If you do it will likely be considered disruptive editing Grachester (talk) 05:00, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

LOCAL issues of MINQI is relevant to its history in zh,you could check in discussion of Transnational authoritarianism, local member learn that suggest I should raise this with an administrator to have MINQI banned.How could I explain the connection without it? Because the active matters is on going in Transnational authoritarianism connected to matters in zh,I am despair local staffs couldn't understand the case and make it gone away. Longway22 (talk) 05:06, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism is the wrong place for your report. It clearly says that this noticeboard is for reports of vandalism only. You may want to reply to the discussion that is already underway at Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#USER:Longway22_breached_an_rules_again_and_again as that would be the correct place to take your complaint. Grachester (talk) 05:10, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I see you were already notified of that discussion. Why have you not responded there? Abusing WP:AIV instead is not appropriate. Grachester (talk) 05:13, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

we THE MEMBER familiar in MINQI's harassment WELL ENOUGH THAT would not like being bombing as it keep bombing texts without ending Longway22 (talk) 05:20, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

as I said in record, the MINQI is using every step of tones to make every one didn't buy its points look like no good,and MINQI would keep using the unresponsive systems against every member that file complaint or have disagreement with it in all cases Longway22 (talk) 05:14, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The satffs should know although MINQI had gotten blocked many times for what it done in all zhwiki cases,we the members familiar in MINQI's harassment is out of hands on MINQI finally,like our fellows user百战天虫 and user維基百科最忠誠的反對者 will not leave any comment on MINQI more with its abusing by keep bombing with reports,all we tired of endless messing up by that guy as it wouldn't stop the patterns, By the way,zhadmins now wouldn't deal with all the issues of MINQI (FOR SAME ENDLEES MESSING),just give some zhmember interactive restraining tickets for not being message bombing from MINQI.SORRY that WE ALL HAVE NO IDEA OF ending this. Longway22 (talk) 05:18, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am not an administrator, so there is nothing I can do. The only way you can get anything done about this is to respond at the admin noticeboard. Grachester (talk) 05:23, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

THANK FOR NOT HELPING Longway22 (talk) 05:30, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]