User talk:Longcall911

January 2009

If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Audience response, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors;
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam); and,
avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for businesses. For more details about what, exactly, constitutes a conflict of interest, please see our conflict of interest guidelines. Thank you. _Talk Islander 23:50, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

To expand on the reasons for using the above template, this is a single purpose account with the sole intention of removing one particular 'valid' source (a competitor?) from the above article. Smells like coi to me... _Talk Islander 23:52, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Audience response. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. _Talk Islander 23:56, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This editing war appears to have concluded. One or two persistant editors are no longer spammimg this topic. However, I will continue to watch for changes.