User talk:LongLiveMusic/Archive 2

Disambiguation link notification for July 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited P.S. I Love You (1934 song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Angels (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:02, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

July 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to 1967 in music may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

*"[[All My Love (Bolero)|All My Love]" – [[Cliff Richard]]

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 00:38, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

August 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Anne Murray discography may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

| "[[Now and Forever (You and Me)]"

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:17, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A beer for you!

Good job on the Archies related articles! Caden ^cool 13:09, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

December 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Beautiful (The Reels album) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

# "[[(Last Night) I Didn't Get to Sleep at All]])" ([[Tony Macaulay]]) - 3:16

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 08:04, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Jingle Jangle

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

I originally created an article entitled "Jingle Jangle" based on The Archies song which has since been moved to "Jingle Jangle (The Archies song)" so that "Jingle Jangle" could be started for a Bee Gees song. The has caused all the articles that should be linked to The Archies page to be linked to the Bee Gees page. My question is I believe that The Archies song should be the primary topic since it charted while the Bee Gees song was just a song from an EP. I believe more people would search for The Archies song. I didn't want to move it back since I know I would be a little biased since I created a page. Is there a place on Wikipedia where I can go to talk about proposed moves? Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by LongLiveMusic (talk • contribs) 04:28, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Requested moves is the appropriate venue for such requests. Please remember to sign your comments on talk pages using four tildes ~~~~. Regards ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 04:46, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

LongLiveMusic stating the other song is a non-single song and you believe The Archies song should be the primary article since it was a single that charted so it is more likely to be searched is a valid reason for RM. But the wikilinks directing to the wrong target isn't, by going to what links here on each article you can see what links there and can fix the wikilink to say Jingle Jangle rather than Jingle Jangle or vice versa. But I'd now wait to see the outcome of the RM before altering the wikilinks otherwise you'd have to undo the fixes you made if the RM was successful. Might be best to remove the latter part of your RM rationale as you would not want to dilute a strong reason for moving, up to you. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 05:42, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]