User talk:Londoncouch
October 2019
[edit]
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to UBeam, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. The Mirror Cracked (talk) 22:39, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Beauty School Dropout. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Artichoke have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. Beauty School Dropout (talk) 01:22, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Cauliflower. ... and on Brussel sprout. Zefr (talk) 01:56, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
Blocked as a sockpuppet
[edit] | This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of EVnerd2000 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · logs · block log · arb · rfc · lta · SPI · cuwiki) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Mz7 (talk) 09:46, 21 October 2019 (UTC) |