User talk:LoncarLoncici
Dobro dosli na moju sranicu!
Welcome to my own talk page!
Hello, LoncarLoncici. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Budimir Lončar, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Budimir Lončar to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.
If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.
Thanks, Wgolf (talk) 04:41, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
Hello, LoncarLoncici. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Milomir Marić, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Milomir Marić to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.
If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.
Thanks, Wgolf (talk) 04:41, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
Wikilinking
[edit]Hi, and thanks for your work on the English Wikipedia.
I noticed an article you worked on. Just a short note to point out that we don’t normally link:
- dates
- years
- commonly known geographical terms (including well-known country-names), and
- common terms you’d look up in a dictionary (unless significantly technical).
(This even applies to infoboxes.)
Thanks, and my best wishes.
Tony (talk) 12:50, 21 April 2014 (UTC)
Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution
[edit]
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Jasenovac concentration camp into Srbosjek. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Ninja Diannaa (Talk) 14:23, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have recently shown interest in the Balkans. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect: any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or any page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
--Joy [shallot] (talk) 15:45, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
It appears you have an axe to grind. Please don't abuse Wikipedia to promote fringe views. There is no suppression in the use of redirects, esp. not when all the content is already at the destination page, on a topic that was discussed previously, at length, over the period of decades. Barging in after another half a decade, and describing other editors as ustasha apologists is an egregious breach of decorum. If you continue to flaunt the most basic rules of Wikipedia, you will be prevented from doing so, according to the same rules. --Joy [shallot] (talk) 15:53, 17 August 2018 (UTC)