User talk:Lolliapaulina51

Minor edits

Please do not mark as minor edits that are not actually minor edits, as you did to Sally Hemings. Adding or deleting sentences, categories, or entire sections of an article are not minor edits. Marking a major change as a minor one is considered rude at best, and can be considered deliberately deceptive. The rule of thumb is that only an edit that consists solely of spelling corrections, formatting changes, or rearranging of text without modifying content should be flagged as a 'minor edit.' Please click "My preferences" at the top of the page, click the "Editing" tab, and uncheck "Mark all edits minor by default". Thank you. Ward3001 (talk) 21:16, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps you would be so kind as to explain why my very small edit to Sally Hemings is considered "major" by you. Given that I said nothing about Hemings' ethnic background that had not already been mentioned in the article -- I merely clarified -- I am puzzled. I did not delete any sentences or sections, and my "addition" was merely a slight clarification. I might point out that it is also the responsiblity of Wiki editors to make themselves entirely clear to contributors in a detailed manner. You have not done so.Lolliapaulina51 (talk) 23:26, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Personal analysis

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Sally Hemings. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Ward3001 (talk) 02:19, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tell me something, Ward: are you claiming that well-educated Wiki participants -- indeed, trained historians -- may not add commentary or, if you prefer to call it that, "personal points of view"? I have many colleagues who have been asked to contribute to encyclopedias. I edited some articles for a major encyclopedia. The reason that such individuals are asked to make contributions is that they are not only trained in historical method, it is thought that their experience and knowledge will be useful. On Wiki, this is not a violation of the "Neutral Point of View" policy; we do, after all, prefer that articles be written and edited by knowledgeable individuals. It is, however, unrealistic and idealistic to expect that when a scholar of history edits an article, no "personal commentary" will be offered, and no one should object to this when it is backed up by a major publication. No one at major academic presses expects this (far from it), so why do you? Wiki articles are filled with such commentary by experts in given fields. If you are not aware of that, I certainly am. I see it every day.Lolliapaulina51 (talk) 23:25, 27 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Princess, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Queen (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:33, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Advocacy in Nicholas Monsarrat

Hi,
Monsarrat is an author famous for his war novel The Cruel Sea.
In 2009, you modified his article, adding:

but perhaps best known internationally for his novels, The Tribe That Lost Its Head 
and its sequel, Richer Than All His Tribe.
Monsarrat's more famous novels, notably The Tribe That Lost Its Head (1956) 
and its sequel Richer Than All His Tribe (1968)

"Internationally"? Where?
What is your basis for assigning this degree of importance to these two obscurities?
Perhaps they're brilliant; that does not make them famous, certainly not more famous than a genuinely famous novel.
Sincerely, Varlaam (talk) 06:14, 22 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jeannie Aur Juju, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ground Control (check to confirm | [[tools:~dispenser/cgi-OK

..... bin/dab_solver.py/Jeannie_Aur_Juju|fix with Dab solver]]). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:31, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WP:ME

Thank you for your contributions. Please remember to mark your edits as "minor" only if they truly are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. Toccata quarta (talk) 17:11, 2 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cyndi Lauper, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kinky Boots (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:11, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Circassia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Adyghe (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 7 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Gretchen Fraser, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Don Fraser (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:59, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Lolliapaulina51. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]