User talk:Lojze Pergl

Welcome

Hello Lojze Pergl, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page — I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Table of Contents

Department directory

Need help?

Questions — a guide on where to ask questions.
Cheatsheet — quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes.
Wikipedia's 5 pillars — an overview of Wikipedia's foundations
Article Wizard — a Wizard to help you create articles

The Simplified Ruleset — a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules.
Guide to Wikipedia — A thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia.

How you can help:

Contributing to Wikipedia — a guide on how you can help.

Community Portal — Wikipedia's hub of activity.

Additional tips...

Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The or button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.

If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills the Sandbox is for you.

Lojze Pergl, good luck, and have fun. --FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 23:01, 4 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

August 2010

Please do not replace Wikipedia pages with blank content, as you did to the page Talk:Lojzo. Blank pages can confuse readers, and are overall not helpful to the Wikipedia project; furthermore, blanking a page is not the same as deleting it.

If the article you blanked is a duplicate of another article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If the page has been vandalized, please revert it to the last legitimate revision. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please use the appropriate deletion process. — $Jeff G. ツ$ 16:13, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Obviously you don't understand what you are talking about. Lojze Pergl (talk) 16:14, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Talk:Lojzo. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. — $Jeff G. ツ$ 16:16, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content from pages without explanation, as you did with this edit to James (name). If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. — $Jeff G. ツ$ 16:17, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Go away, troll. I did nothing wrong. Lojze Pergl (talk) 16:18, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Lojze, why don't you just tone it down. I've asked the above editor to remove the warning, but your personal attacks (you called me a "troll" as well) and the tenor of your edit summaries and other commentary easily provoke others. I encourage you to have a cup of tea and a quick skim of WP:CIVIL. Happy editing. Drmies (talk) 16:25, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is your final warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you make a personal attack, as you did with this edit to User talk:Access Denied. — $Jeff G. ツ$ 16:24, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your threatful behavior without looking into the essence of edits is disgrace to wikipedia. Lojze Pergl (talk) 16:25, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Assume good faith, please. Namecalling is never productive. Jeff, Access, let's let the editor get back to work and assume that they will help improve the project. Happy editing to all. Drmies (talk) 16:28, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for harassment of other editors and disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal the block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Toddst1 (talk) 16:41, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Very nice. I am being harassed, my editing was disrupted and now I got blocked "for harassment". I am out of here, you bullies. Lojze Pergl (talk) 16:42, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I understand that initially I've been unnecessary rude in my edit comments. Nevertheless, your "shock therapy" reception of a new editor makes me think that I would rather not work with such an aggressive team, which shoots without asking. Good luck to wikipedia, anyway. It is a useful project, and I guess there will always be enough mellow people to edit. Lojze Pergl (talk) 17:15, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Lojze, follow the guideline on the blocking template above to request to be unblocked. If you don't shoot you'll always miss, as the Dutch say. Good luck. Drmies (talk) 17:27, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Lojze Pergl (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I cooled down after the treatment I see as unjust (if it is unclear from my short edit history, I may spell my point of view in detail). I understand that I have to keep my opinions to myself and just stay away from people who would quickly assume that you are vandal without looking into the essence of your edits. I will not seek for justice against editors who wronged me; I hope life will eventually teach them a good lesson when their asttitude backfires. I will keep my language within acceptable limits, to decrease the chance of my work obstructed.

Decline reason:

Not going to happen. You are only blocked for 48 hours, sit it out then come back and edit constructively. Your unblock request above does not really instill confidence. Tiptoety ^talk 19:45, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

<Sigh>. Goodbye for good, then. All I did was editing constructively, then WHAMM!!. I was pissed off OK. I bite my tongue. OK. I promised to behave. If it is not enough for you, I will not lick your feet to prove it. I guess, you don't need me, and definitely I don't need to deal with people of your worldview. Lojze Pergl (talk) 21:53, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]