User talk:Logicalthinker33/Archive 2

Jehovah's Witnesses

Hi, just wondering why you removed the sources at the JW article here. I'm not complaining or criticizing but didn't fully understand and just wanted to be clear. Thanks JodyB_talk 12:09, 30 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, I went through those references and found that all those four are not necessary to support the statement given there. So I removed two of them which are from old magazines and thus saved the space.--Logical Thinker:talk 16:09, 30 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, sounds good to me. I didn't really think it was a vandal edit as that would not be your style but I'm always curious when I see sources removed from a page. Have a great day! JodyB_talk 21:22, 31 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Watchtower Magazine English issues.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Watchtower Magazine English issues.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 18:06, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You for reminding me, actually I forgot. Now corrected it--Logical Thinker:talk 18:12, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Links going to unexpected places

Hi Logicalthinker33, when you're linking to other articles, could you try to make sure that the links go where you expect them to? For example, with The Watchtower and Awake!, you linked to a lot of language articles, but many of the links either went to disambiguation pages, or to an article on something else. See this edit for example. If you're going to add more links to language articles, it's worth bearing in mind that many language articles have the word "language" in the title as often, the word can also refer to a country or an ethnic group. One way you can easily check is to run an article through this tool, and that will tell you what links you have to disambiguation pages. That doesn't catch the ones that go to actual articles on a different topic though! It takes a bit of extra time to check links, but it helps avoid confusion in our readers! :) --Beloved Freak 22:08, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You did a great job! Thank you so much for your kind advice. I will be careful in future.--Logical Thinker:talk 06:11, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I considered fixing those language article links. However, please see the Language section at the Talk pages of each of those articles.--Jeffro77 (talk) 08:03, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have posted my reply there. Thank you--Logical Thinker:talk 08:27, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

tb

Hello, Logicalthinker33. You have new messages at Guerillero's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

"code correction" to Template:Infobox Indian jurisdiction

Adding a parameter to an established template is more than just a "code correction". It comes with an obligation to document the new parameter. If you're unsure how to do this, please reply. If you leave the new parameter undocumented, I will revert your edit. --Stepheng3 (talk) 19:40, 16 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for that, I will do that soon. Don't revert, if reverted the consequences will reflect on all pages where it is used--Logical Thinker:talk 08:18, 17 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

3RR

I imagine you are well aware of WP:3RR, and I'm advising you that you have now reached the limit for today on editing at Jehovah's Witnesses. Nomoskedasticity (talk) 11:31, 17 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I know the rule. Thanks for reminding --Logical Thinker:talk 12:29, 17 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Logicalthinker33 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. BlackCab (talk) 00:38, 19 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I don't have any relation with the persons you said. I am working in wiki for past 2 months and I had never misused any account. Thank you--Logical Thinker:talk 04:24, 19 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Awake cover Feb2007.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Awake cover Feb2007.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:12, 15 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Watchtower Magazine English issues.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Watchtower Magazine English issues.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:46, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed your talk page archiving

Hi! I took the liberty of fixing the auto-archiving settings at the top of this page. --rchard2scout (talk) 13:19, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]