User talk:Loftlol

October 2017

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to DreamWorks Trollhunters has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: DreamWorks Trollhunters was changed by Loftlol (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.871813 on 2017-10-12T03:21:22+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 03:21, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

November 2017

Hello, I'm Tarl N.. Your recent edit to the page Super Bowl LII appears to have added incorrect information, so I have removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Tarl N. (discuss) 05:40, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not blank pages, as you did with this edit to Gen:Lock, because it is considered vandalism; instead, use the sandbox for testing. If you think the page should be deleted, see here for what to do. Thank you. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 00:14, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Rainmaker Entertainment, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 02:53, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm TAnthony. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Titans (2018 TV series), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — TAnthony^Talk 18:42, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Amblin Entertainment. Shellwood (talk) 23:06, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your edits to Chucky (Child's Play), the character is neither a ghost nor a demon. He just transferred his soul into a doll. Dark Knight 2149 22:05, 20 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. DMacks (talk) 22:30, 25 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

December 2017

Hello, I'm ChamithN. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Auli'i Cravalho, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ChamithN (talk) 06:05, 17 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to DICE Los Angeles. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- ferret (talk) 01:22, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- ferret (talk) 14:10, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Loftlol (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #20204 was submitted on Jan 01, 2018 03:54:59. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 03:55, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

January 2018

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Favonian (talk) 12:52, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]