User talk:LocoWiki

Welcome to Wikipedia from ForgottenHistory

Hi, Wiki2010XD. I welcome you to Wikipedia! Thank you for all of your edits. I hope you like editing here and being part of Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); when you save the page, this will turn into your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or put {{helpme}} (and what you need help with) on your talk page and someone will show up very soon to answer your questions. Again, welcome! ForgottenHistory (talk) 00:41, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Jaime Enrique Aymara

This is the English Wikipedia, could you please translate the the titles of your references into English. Also, please find some English references. Spanish references are fine if there are not English references available. Bgwhite (talk) 06:49, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

April 2014

You are receiving this as you have recently added an interwiki link to a page!

Wikidata has been deployed to the English Wikipedia. Wikidata manages interwiki links on a separate project on pages such as this. This means that on Wikipedia articles there is now a language bar on the left hand side of your screen where you can edit and add links rather than adding them into the articles themselves.

If you have any questions regarding Wikidata please use the talk page Wikipedia talk:Wikidata.

Dl2000 (talk) 02:00, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:23, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, LocoWiki. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, LocoWiki. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, LocoWiki. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

March 2019

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 13:02, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

LocoWiki (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello, I make a request for unlocking my user account “LocoWiki”, as it has apparently come to a misunderstanding. I haven´t written before because I've been very busy, and I don't usually collaborate too much on English Wikipedia, the performed on the Wikipedia in English are few modifications, fixes and add images for illustrate the articles when I add important things in the articles in Spanish. Honestly, I 'm surprised when I find that I was blocked forever because I have “Abusively used multiple accounts”, since I have done nothing wrong that could harm the encyclopedia, then the afore mentioned. However, I see that the reason is for supposedly being a “sockpuppet” with the accounts of “Cosmoxino” and “El bien y el mal”, now recently to that of “Wiki2010XD”. About this mistake, I think that it is because we share the same IPs because of the same Internet we have at home, it turns out that “Cosmoxino” he's my brother, and he's almost never admitted. The other user is my best friend and he also works with me as cameraman in my recordings, ”El bien y el Mal”, and since he doesn´t have a computer, so he edits from my laptop, because we work together in the audiovisual. He performs the function of cameraman of everything I do, and I encouraged him to join Wikipedia, however it hasn´t done anything wrong to be blocked also. He was working on some articles that translated and ask to your reception, but instead we end up all being blocked and accused of “sockpuppets”. In the case of resenting “Wiki2010XD” that's his unique and real case because that account is mine and is recognized as “sockpuppet” in the Spanish version of Wikipedia, because originally my user was called like that, but then I did the request change user name to “LocoWiki”, and they just made the change when I sign up as “Wiki2010XD”, automatically that user, when I find out of what happened, I start good with my account as “LocoWiki”, however by the custom of the previous user, sometimes started session on the other and was doing editions, until I was relegating it to functions purely of elemental maintenance, such as transfers or creating redirects, but never anything improper, and it´s recognized in the description of user as sockpuppet, which is not banned as long as it is recognized that it is a sockpuppet and do not use it for voting, although I think it confuses me the last time and use a discussion of the Wikipedia in Portuguese, but is a mistake, I've used it without arbitrary end or that may harm the Wikipedia. Only for elementary maintenance. The truth I hope this misunderstanding is resolved, because I think it only reason in what we are accused of being sockpuppets, however I was not made a call from attention to be aware, and also I think it has been very exaggerated to block me forever without having committed something that may be detrimental or vandal for the platform. Anyway, I think that in good faith that the mistake was by concern they had to see this situation. I expect a prompt response. Additional about the explanation I made here, I apologized about everything can referral me as a sockpuppet, unfortunately I don’t know too much about english wikipedia rules but I will read more about this if you make me the chance for being unlocked. LocoWiki (talk) 22:09, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficiently convincing for any reviewing administrator to take action. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. Yamla (talk) 13:48, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Blocked

I still wait for an answer. Bbb23.--LocoWiki (talk) 17:49, 17 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

LocoWiki (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Dear wikipedia administrators, I promise not to use any account, and do not get lost in the accounts. I will only use this page in LocoWiki, because I will not have much knowledge about these processes in this Wikipedia, but now that I know.I look forward to receiving my respective unlocking by you. Regards. LocoWiki (talk) 22:29, 15 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

The WP:Standard Offer will be available to you after 6 months of being blocked on 27 September 2019. Until then, I suggest you spend your time reviewing and acquainting yourself with the various conduct policies on English Wikipedia by observing others. You will need to email the checkuser group per our checkuser block policy at that time to confirm that you have not abused editing privileges by using more sockpuppets or by evading your block. Unfortunately, there is nothing I am willing or can do until that time. Sasquatch t|c 02:34, 26 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

LocoWiki (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Dear wikipedia administrators, I promise not to use any account, and do not get lost in the accounts. I will only use this page in LocoWiki, because I will not have much knowledge about these processes in this Wikipedia, but now that I know. I look forward to receiving my respective unlocking by you. In spanish: Recurro nuevamente al desbloqueo de mi cuenta, ya que pasó el tiempo para poder realizar la solicitud nuevamente, de acuerdo a lo que me comentó el usuario anterior. Espero me entiendan, ya que no conocía estas normas de los "títeres" por lo que hubo una confusión que no se repetirá más por mi parte. Saludos. Regards.--LocoWiki (talk) 17:48, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficient for any reviewing administrator to take action. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. Yamla (talk) 12:42, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

CU detects no immediate signs of socking, so I don't have concerns there if an admin wants to unblock from a CU standpoint, but please talk to Bbb23 first if someone is considering an unblock. TonyBallioni (talk) 02:46, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]