User talk:Lockergirl
I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article ShaVonne Jackson, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Pascal.Tesson 14:04, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
May 2007
[edit]
Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as ShaVonne Jackson, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Kim Dent-Brown (Talk to me) 17:14, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
ShaVonne Jackson, again
[edit]The article you submitted provides absolutely no assertion of notability explaining why the subject needs an article in an encyclopedia. If you can provide evidence for her meeting our standards for musicians, you can recreate the article, being sure to cite reliable sources. You can also request a deletion review. -- Merope 18:50, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
ShaVonne Jackson, again
[edit]Yeah, it was!
Merope|Merope
[edit]You may delete this username, and of course the ShaVonne Jackson article. I should have read the criteria, before preceding with the article. It's NOT that important I post one afterall. I'm feeling a little disgusted, because I really didn't know what I was doing, but tried. At any rate precede with your deletions...
The file File:ShaVonne.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Uploaded seemingly intended for use in the now-deleted article ShaVonne Jackson. Appears to be a posed publicity photograph claimed as own work. Unused and no obvious encyclopedic use.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. mattbr 08:45, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
