User talk:Lmaoooderek

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Nickiandyeoutsold! Your additions to Kanye West have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. – Muboshgu (talk) 00:32, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

January 2022

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Kids See Ghosts (album). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 03:00, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

can you chill it was literally an accident you virgin

i even posted in talk that i broke it and need someone to fix it Nickiandyeoutsold (talk) 11:21, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

February 2022

Hello, I'm RogueShanghai. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Nicki Minaj, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. shanghai.^{talk to me} 05:41, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to assume bad faith when dealing with other editors, as you did at User:Tbhotch, you may be blocked from editing. Assume that they are here to improve rather than harm Wikipedia. —MelbourneStar☆^talk 05:55, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at DS4Ever. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 06:14, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Kanye West, you may be blocked from editing. You have been warned not to change the photo. The photo has been chosen by discussion on the talk page. – Muboshgu (talk) 16:54, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

March 2022

Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Offset (rapper). Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Binksternet (talk) 05:41, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours to prevent further vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Alexf^(talk) 09:41, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

April 2022

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at Teflon Don (album). Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 19:36, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Future (rapper). This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Zinnober9 (talk) 02:42, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Russ

When they were released Russ called his earlier works albums and they were reviewed as such. Later he called them mixtapes but that was for commercial reasons of some sort, regards Atlantic306 (talk) 23:23, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

this makes sense, thanks Nickiandyeoutsold (talk) 23:24, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:King’s Disease III

Hello, Nickiandyeoutsold. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:King’s Disease III, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:01, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

May 2022

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Queen (Nicki Minaj album), it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. per WP:CRYSTAL, anything could happen between now and summer 2022. The album could be released early, it could be serially delayed, she might cancel it, retire etc. There's lots of possibilities and therefore too much speculation. We generally don't add albums to the infobox until we have a confirmed name, date and article. ≫ Lil-Unique1 -{ Talk }- 22:07, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

makes sense, thanks for the insight Nickiandyeoutsold (talk) 23:43, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Breezy

Yo remove the extra tracks on BREEEZY. Chris Brown said it's 23 tracks on his new interview with big boy. User:Instantwatym please add back the good text removed without no reason 5.91.155.65 (talk) 20:53, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, you may be blocked from editing. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 05:22, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:King’s Disease III

Hello, Nickiandyeoutsold. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "King’s Disease III".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:36, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Stop making things up

I’ve been looking over your past edits and notice one very big pattern. You tend to make up your own information and front it as factual. Changing a large portion of Donda 2's page based on a rumor and especially saying that Rick James praised Nicki Minaj's sample of Super Freak even though he died in 2004. Buddy look, I’m going to level with you, I use to do the same things you did. I took for granted the right to edit these pages. I grew from it and learned, and you can too. But you got to stop making up your own information and writing things that aren’t factual as if they were. Provide a source, and write a coherent sentence or paragraph about what you want to say. Instead of saying "smash hit song" or "#1 song" just say single or song. Simple is better. If you continue with this pattern there will be someone who has enough and blocks you. I don’t want to have to come back here and give you a warning, so please, take this as advice and as constructive criticism, and learn from it. Zvig47 (talk) 05:57, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

i don’t know who the fuck you think you are bucking up anonymously on someone’s talk page, but stop lmfao. it takes a quick google search to see that his estate (under his name) expressed their approval for the song on twitter.

also my donda 2 edits were factually correct. the album is going to have an entirely new rollout shortly, as made known by ye’s team. use your google machine (the same one you used to make this dumbass post on my page).

miss me with this bullshit. Nickiandyeoutsold (talk) 16:53, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

First off this isn’t anonymous, I literally credited myself at the bottom. Second there’s a difference in saying that Rick James praised a song and his estate, and even so you didn't cite it. If your Donda 2 edits were "factually correct", then CITE THEM. And look I tried with you man, if you’re warned or blocked after this just know I tried to help you. Zvig47 (talk) 17:14, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Amplifying what Zvig47 said: it isn't enough for edits to be factually correct; they must also be verifiable. If you don't cite a reliable source, the edit can be challenged and removed. —C.Fred (talk) 03:08, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Furthermore, Wikipedia is a collaborative project. Comments need to focus on the content, not the contributors. Comments that include personal attacks are not allowed, and users who persist in making such attacks may be blocked. —C.Fred (talk) 03:10, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:55, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

June 2023

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at YSL Records. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 05:14, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]