User talk:Lludovic

Welcome!

Hello, Lludovic, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as IIAR, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! andy (talk) 11:52, 30 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of IIAR

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on IIAR requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. andy (talk) 11:52, 30 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Magic Quadrant. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Kuru (talk) 19:58, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Seriously? The IIAR is the authority on analyst relations and those links to MQ posts add to the conversation. Why did you think they were spam? By the way, I've written a lot of papers and blog posts on AR and on the MQ, not sure who YOU are? Removing the links to the IIAR and leaving the downfall video is just a joke....

It's not a joke. IIAW is not the "authority on analyst relations". There are enough links on the page to explain and explore the topic, there is no need for what appears to be a very low content series of blog entries. Reviewing your editing history, you appear to be adding quite a bit of material promoting this entity; are there other sources or links unrelated to this organization you'd like to add? Kuru (talk) 11:48, 25 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The IIAR is the only independent professional association of Analyst Relations professional, so I'm not sure how and why you're asserting that it's not the authority on AR? Is your background in IT analysis or AR? Secondly, I can list specific posts, but all the material on the IIAR blog has been peer reviewed and commented. It truly makes authority in our industry. Thirdly, the fact you've removed links to the IIAR and left others is an indication you're applying some sort of policy (I thought Wikipedia was for the People...) and disregarded the actual content.

In other words, I beg to disagree and challenge your editing.

TrustRadius

No need to email me: we have perfectly good communication opportunities. I didn't delete your article, though I did nominate it: the deletion was done by another administrator, DGG. Please see WP:A7 for why I tagged it. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 18:09, 19 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your account has been blocked indefinitely for advertising or promotion and violating the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use. This is because you have been making promotional edits to topics in which you have an undisclosed financial stake, yet you have failed to adhere to the mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a form of conflict of interest (COI) editing which involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is strictly prohibited. Using this site for advertising or promotion is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, please read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text {{unblock|reason=your reason here ~~~~}} at the end of your user talk page. For that request to be considered, you must:

Confirm that you have read and understand the Terms of Use and paid editing disclosure requirements.
State clearly how you are being compensated for your edits, and describe any affiliation or conflict of interest you might have with the subjects you have written about.
Describe how you intend to edit such topics in the future. MER-C 11:05, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock|reason=unsubstantiated blocking when all I have done is adding links to a non-profit members organisation, which are BTW factual. This was a rather long time ago but still valid.}}

@lludovic 21:38, 20 March 2023 (UTC)