User talk:Lloyd Wood

Welcome!

Hello, Lloyd Wood, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! CLW 11:45, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hyphenation of "critically acclaimed"

Please see WP:HYPHEN, which states "A hyphen is not used after a standard -ly adverb". When you have digested this, please let me know so I can go back to fixing such articles. Chris the speller ^yack 00:07, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Martin Sweeting, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page FRS. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:42, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:39, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Lloyd Wood. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Managing conflict of interest (Saratoga)

Hello, Lloyd Wood. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about in the article List of TCP and UDP port numbers, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:

avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the {{request edit}} template);
when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you.

PS: Could you please give me a quotation from the reference you added in Special:Diff/772302281, if possible? 80.221.152.17 (talk) 02:26, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

March 2017

Hello, I'm 80.221.152.17. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, it's important to be mindful of the feelings of your fellow editors, who may be frustrated by certain types of interaction, such as your addition to List of TCP and UDP ports. While you probably didn't intend any offense, please do remember that Wikipedia strives to be an inclusive atmosphere. In light of that, it would be greatly appreciated if you could moderate yourself so as not to offend. Thank you. 80.221.152.17 (talk) 09:44, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have no idea who 80.221.152.17 is - but that person seems unfamiliar with technical aspects of computer networking, with the Internet Assigned Numbers Authority being, you know, an actual authority, or with the irony of raising conflict of interest issues while hiding behind an anonymous account to hide any conflict of interest issues and throwing boilerplate around. As I said to the person who first added Saratoga to that page and got me involved, Wikipedia isn't worth his time.

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at List of TCP and UDP port numbers. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. I feel like Special:Diff/772446740 suggests you're still using Wikipedia:Passive aggression towards me.

For what it's worth, I did check the reference you mentioned in the edit summary before saving. I searched for Saratoga: A Convergence Layer for Delay Tolerant Networking and couldn't find the IETF draft draft-wood-tsvwg-saratoga I wanted. Thank you for referencing it now; I'll convert it to Template:Cite IETF format soon.

I believe myself to have a good understanding of RFCs and Internet drafts, so please take the time to let me understand better next time. I also acknowledge IANA to be the authorative source, however I also take WP:CSC into consideration. If there's something you still disagree with, you may use the article talk page (Talk:List of TCP and UDP port numbers) or on my talk page at User talk:80.221.152.17 to avoid potential conflict of interest and edit warring. 80.221.152.17 (talk) 10:22, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding my previous edits which removed Saratoga from the list, to date my web search result for Saratoga doesn't have a search result for the file transfer protocol on first three search result pages. That's why I had originally removed it and assumed it was unnotable. 80.221.152.17 (talk) 10:34, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not going to bother with commenting on the talk page of a floating IP address. Get an account. This page is stable, at least. Your comments on the talk pages of other anonymous IP-address contributors aren't being read - so your removal of the original mention was seen as quite passive-aggressive by a first-time contributor who will never contribute to Wikipedia again, and who has never seen the comment on his talk page. Good job. (and your repeated boilerplate and lawyering? Also passive-aggressive, and probably heavily bot/script automated, given all the imo pointless reference work you're doing. Careful reference work, yes, in whatever citing style is current for Wikipedia, yes, but rather overdone. Especially since IANA is the authority in this case.)

If it's got an IANA reference, there's got to be IETF or IRTF documentation - so you search on IETF Saratoga. IANA is authoritative here, just as IEEE is authoritative for Ethernet standards. That the page is missing things IANA includes is... well, pointless, as are the random references to things that are informally documented at best but not in IANA. IANA is maintained by professionals, and because the Internet needs that list to function, getting an allocation is some work. (While this page was described to me as "The wikipedia page isn't so much a mirror of the IANA registry as it is a circus funhouse mirror version of it.")

Saratoga started in the IRTF as draft-wood-dtnrg-saratoga, which still exists, before moving the bulk of protocol mechanism to tsvwg as more appropriate. A good way to understand RFCs and internet-drafts is to write a couple; the process is rather different to Wikipedia.

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Lloyd Wood. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Forever beef for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Forever beef is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Forever beef until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. power~enwiki (π, ν) 05:40, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Ashley Storrie: Uncivil behavior warning

Hello, I'm Tiggerjay. I noticed that you made a comment here that didn't seem very civil. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. TiggerJay (talk) 04:53, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]