User talk:Lktguy

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gregson Maluma (July 20)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Bonadea was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: A very recent community discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gregson Maluma determined that Maluma is not notable according to Wikipedia's definition of notability. Since this draft has the exact same issues that were raised in the deletion discussion, it is clear that he is not (yet) notable enough for an article.

bonadea contributions talk 13:35, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Lktguy! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! bonadea contributions talk 13:35, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Greg Maluma for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Greg Maluma is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Greg Maluma until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 13:15, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Mcgraham giyan per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mcgraham giyan. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Sir Sputnik (talk) 01:43, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]