User talk:LkeYHOBSTorItEwA

November 2020

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Big lie. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Favonian (talk) 11:00, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It's a badge of honor to be the first Wikipedia editor to include a link to Trump's Wikipedia article in Big Lie. It was mainstream then, but some editors disagreed it was relevant. It took a year and a statement from the next president to be accepted by other editors. That's history, folks. LkeYHOBSTorItEwA (talk) 21:13, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, LkeYHOBSTorItEwA, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to 2021 United States Capitol attack. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help. Need some ideas about what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 04:23, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Talk Page Comments

You seem to be depositing a lot of these opinion sources such as on Talk:Elden Ring on article talk pages you frequent. Please review the reliable sources guidelines before mentioning sources such as "Know Your Meme" or "Orthodox Church.com". Your sources and editing likely not be included in the article unless they are listed here. If you want to actively make changes, I suggest making an edit request. CollectiveSolidarity (talk) 14:29, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. So in the Elden Ring talk page, I suggested that the ubiquitous blowback against longstanding AAA open-world trends, and their unfavorable comparison to Elden Ring, be documented in"Reception" (or wherever) because it is noteworthy. I provided examples, including social media feuds between game companies, documented in some detail on KnowYourMeme (which I provided a link for on the Talk page). The Talk page is not a series of scholarly articles.

As for "OrthodoxChurch.com", I also asked for clarification from researchers on the talk page because I wanted assistance sorting propaganda from news, and my family is pushing that source hard, saying atrocities are not being covered. I am skeptical, especially given the source.

I do not understand why you felt the need to come to my talk page and challenge requests for feedback by the community on topics related to those articles. LkeYHOBSTorItEwA (talk) 21:30, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I sincerely apologize regarding the Orthodox Church article. I misunderstood that you were advocating for the inclusion of a non RS website in the article. I also apologize for the Elden Ring comment, but the listings seemed like a fringe viewpoint considering many of your sources appeared to be blocked on this list. If you still seek to include that viewpoint in the reception section, I'd suggest finding some more widely circulated sources, and avoid Know Your Meme because it is self-published by users. However, Game Developer is considered reliable and I would be happy to include its commentary. CollectiveSolidarity (talk) 21:54, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, no problem LkeYHOBSTorItEwA (talk) 02:19, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]