User talk:Lkaliba

Welcome

Hello, Lkaliba, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! - ^theWOLFchild 23:30, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Finding your way around
Table of contents Department directory Help directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Our new user help forum, the Teahouse Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
How you can help
Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

July 2014

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistent re-insertion into an article of copyright violations uploaded at Commons. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Black Kite (talk) 10:07, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Divergent (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page New Yorker. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 12 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Maze Runner

Please see the discussion at Talk:The Maze Runner (film)#Credibility of reviews and participate in it. It is disruptive to engage in contentious editing without joining a discussion. Thanks, Erik (talk | contrib) ^{(ping me)} 19:02, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to The Maze Runner (film) does not have an edit summary.Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! Erik (talk | contrib) ^{(ping me)} 20:57, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hunger Games Mockingjay Disruptive Edits

This is in regards your recent edits to the above mentioned page. While anyone is free to contribute to Wikipedia your edits must fall within Wikipedia editing standards. Your contribution to The Hunger Games Mockingjay bordered on vandalism with many points you included having already been removed for reasons explained in the edit summery. You also provided no reasons for your changes. It's okay if this was a mistake but it seems you have already been blocked from another page for making disruptive changes. Please be sure to consult the talk page before making any drastic changes as you have done.

Thanks. - An Unexpected Journey 18:12, 21 Novmber 2014 (UTC

Your recent edits on film-related articles

Hi there. I notice that you've been active at The Hunger Games: Mockingjay – Part 1, where you reverted a series of edits that brought the article into better compliance with our guidelines and policies. Specifically, you reverted the removal of words to avoid/peacock terms and efforts to make the article more neutral. Instead of reverting, you should discuss your desired changes on the talk page and seek consensus for them. If you believe that consensus is not possible, you can try making use of Wikipedia's dispute resolution, such as starting an RFC or the dispute resolution noticeboard. If you make a habit of reverting articles back to a state that violates our guidelines, especially if you do so against consensus, you could end up blocked for disruption. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 18:26, 21 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

In Regards Your Recent Edits

Warning

Can you please discuss any changes you wish to make on the talk page. You have not tried to explain your reasons why you believe the edits are justified especially since they are such drastic ones. Your tone is not very neutral and if you keep this up you may well end up being blocked for disruption. This isn't your first message in regards to your edits so I would advise you evaluate. Thanks. - An Unexpected Journey 18:36, 22 Novmber 2014 (UTC)

Some friendly advice

It seems that you are ignoring Wikipedia guidelines with your contributions to The Hunger Games: Mockingjay – Part 1, despite other editors informing you of the problems. Editing here is a privilege, not a right and if you continue down this road your editing rights may be suspended. Please discuss any changes that you wish to make on the article's talk page to avoid further conflict. Thank you for your attention. Philg88 ^♦talk 18:53, 22 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Divergent Series, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Young-adult. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

August 2015

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you change genre in pages without discussion or sources, as you did at Bad Blood (Taylor Swift song). —Indian:BIO ^{[ ChitChat ]} 09:52, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Revival (Selena Gomez album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Idolator. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:34, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

October 2015

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia. livelikemusic ^{my talk page!} 23:04, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to Revival (Selena Gomez album) does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 01:27, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 15 October

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Revival (Selena Gomez album) page, your edit caused a URL error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:21, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

"Contemporary music critics"

Please do not link the phrase "music critics" in articles, as you did in Revival (Selena Gomez album). Everyday words understood by most readers in context should not be linked, while specifying that the critics were "contemporary music critics" is frivolous verbiage and unencyclopedic writing in an article discussing a music recording released just a few weeks ago. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Thank you. Dan56 (talk) 04:05, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use disruptive, inappropriate formatting, as you did at Revival (Selena Gomez album), you may be blocked from editing. There is a Wikipedia Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Dan56 (talk) 01:26, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hello (Adele song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Telegraph. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:31, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

October 2015

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at 25 (Adele album). Consider this as your last warning if you continue adding WP:COPYVIO content. —Indian:BIO ^{[ ChitChat ]} 21:05, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

November 2015

Hi there! Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your your edits do not have an edit summaries. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Softlavender (talk) 04:52, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your edits do not have an edit summaries. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. This is the fourth notice you've received reminding you to provide an edit summary. Please follow Wikipedia guidelines and do so in the future. Softlavender (talk) 07:45, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to The Hunger Games: Catching Fire. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. ☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 23:09, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 25 (Adele album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The 405. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:01, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

November 2015

Hi there! Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! —Indian:BIO ^{[ ChitChat ]} 21:51, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Adele proposal

Just a reminder that there is an ongoing discussion regarding the potential creation of WikiProject Adele. All comments are welcome and appreciated! MaranoFan (talk) 19:02, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

January 2016

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Star Wars: The Force Awakens, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. - ^theWOLFchild 23:23, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your editing...

...is problematic, As indicated by the numerous warning templates on your talk page. You have four (4) notifications requesting you leave an edit summary with your edits, yet you continue to refuse to do so (Wiki-labs indicates you have failed to leave an edit summary in more than 85% of your edits). Other issues include page or section blanking, repeated WP:OR violations and other forms of disruptive editing. Please read the warnings and notices above and take heed of them. Read the policies I have linked for you here in this comment. And, take note that I have added a 'welcome' template to the top of this page. Please read through it as well, as there is useful information there to help contribute more effectively. Otherwise, your behaviour may lead to you being blocked from editing again, only for longer periods of time, or even indefinitely. You may also want to consider the Wikipedia Adoption Program, where inexperienced and/or troubled editors can pair up with an experienced editor who will help guide them through the project. Please consider this as helpful advice. Cheers - ^theWOLFchild 23:53, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

January 2016

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Star Wars: The Force Awakens. Also, you are still refusing to leave edit summaries, despite numerous notifications. Please consider these warnings carefully, or you may BLOCKED... again. - ^theWOLFchild 00:24, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 26 January

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Blue Is the Warmest Colour page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help) and a cite error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:21, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

February 2016

This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, as you did at Star Wars: The Force Awakens, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. - ^theWOLFchild 16:44, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! - ^theWOLFchild 08:53, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Shailene Woodley, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Deleted Scenes. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 6 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Batman v Superman

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you nPOV vandalize Wikipedia on Batman_v_Superman:_Dawn_of_Justice Read MOS:FILM#Critical response to maintain a neutral point of view, this may not always be possible or desirable (e.g. films that have been almost universally acclaimed or panned as it the case in Batman_v_Superman:_Dawn_of_Justice), and best judgment should be used.Thefearedhallmonitor (talk) 05:14, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

September 2016

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at DC Extended Universe, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Chris "WarMachineWildThing" ^{Talk to me} 02:44, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Chris "WarMachineWildThing" ^{Talk to me} 03:21, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Lkaliba. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

February 2017

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Blue Is the Warmest Colour. You've got a talk page full of warnings, and you've previously blanked several paragraphs of content from this article. Please stop your disruptive editing. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 05:31, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your attention needed at WP:CHU

Hello. A renamer or clerk has responded to your username change request, but requires clarification before moving forward. Please follow up at your username change request entry as soon as possible. Thank you. Taketa (talk) 08:45, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Lkaliba. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DC Extended Universe

I rearranged the section that you had moved inexplicably to the bottom of the page. The page's primary purpose is to discuss the films, and therefor the way it was prior to your changes were fine. If you feel like the it needs changes, one of your size first requires discussing the topic on the talk page. --DisneyMetalhead (talk) 04:33, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Lkaliba. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:16, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]