User talk:Lizzymartin

Speedy deletion nomination of MacGyver the Lizard

Hello Lizzymartin,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged MacGyver the Lizard for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 06:05, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I have added additional citations and notability information, and an editor has since removed the speedy deletion tag. Lizzymartin (talk) 04:57, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

August 2016

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 06:18, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Result of edit conflict in a new page during time of heavy modification (see timestamps) -- Resolved! Lizzymartin (talk) 04:56, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of MacGyver the Lizard for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article MacGyver the Lizard is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MacGyver the Lizard until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:15, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 16 September

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Justin Bieber page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:22, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Issue has been corrected. Accidentally re-defined userbox's 'module' instead of adding 'module2', which caused the first definition of the module, including refs, to disappear. Lizzymartin (talk) 01:01, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]