User talk:Lizok r

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Lizok r (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm kidly asking you to remove the block from my page. I was acting upon my friend's request. He called me and told me about his page and told me that it's for the deletion. I was reading the article in Forbes and decided to help my friend as I was proud of him. My name is Elizaveta Rerikh, I'm an independent person, I'm not connected to Lexeru. I red the rules and understood that I was wrong. I'm sorry for my incorrect actings. Could you kindly unblock my account? I created the account to write and correct the pages about traveling. Even though I haven't done anything I'm going to. I even have been making regular donations for several years to support Wikipedia as I really appreciate this resource and the contribution it has. I'm kindly asking you to unblock my account.Lizok r (talk) 02:01, 14 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You admit your clear connection to Lexeru, you admit you were violating WP:MEAT. But then you make the claim "I'm not connected". These can't both be true. Either you are connected because you were acting on your friend's request, or you have no connection and don't know that person at all. Regardless, we won't unblock you unless you understand why your edits were inappropriate (borderline fraudulent) and unless you agree to a topic ban in all areas for which you have a conflict of interest (and disclose all these subject areas). I'm worried that you'll just write about other subjects for which you have a conflict of interest, given that you've already violated this and given you work in marketing. Yamla (talk) 11:14, 14 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Lizok r (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The reason for the block was the suspicion that my account is not a real account but it's another account of the article author. I just stated that I'm a real person and I've created my account for my personal reasons. I'm an independent person. I didn't even edit the article, so you may not call me a fraud. I just put my argument into the pro-cons discussion. Calling me meatpuppet could be considered as abuse. Lizok r (talk) 22:44, 14 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Calling you a meatpuppet could also be considered an appropriate summary of your conduct. Your friend called you and told you about the deletion discussion, and you immediately went there and argued that the article should be kept. Huon (talk) 23:38, 14 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.