User talk:Livxtrm

Your email comments

Please remember to remain civil in your comments, even via email. I've restored the edits you previously made to the Baltimore Museum of Industry article, so feel free to incorporate them if you wish. Please also note that I have no opinion on the article itself, so please do not assume that I do. Just because I speedy deleted the article doesn't automatically mean that I don't think the article should exist, but rather that it met the criteria for speedy deletion (IMHO). ···日本穣^{? · Talk to Nihonjoe} 21:47, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding email comments

From the criteria: "Before nominating an article for speedy deletion, consider whether an article could be improved or reduced to a stub..." My article clearly contained some useful information I spend the time typing, and you clearly judged it without just using it as a stub.

Also, I fully intended to add in more newsworthy links, so you should note the next sentence. That one says "Not that some Wikipedians create articles in multiple saves... so... avoid deleting a page too soon." Immediately after I post it is too soon.

Also check out the crtieria for Blatant Advert. What I post does not match that either.

Be civil? WTF are you talking about? Grow up. You aren't a baby, and it is you who is randomly deleting stuff without any warning. Also, before telling something they aren't being civil on a public page, you should present some evidence. You are implying I said something bad in the email, and I clearly did not. You should post my email if you are gonna complain about it on my talk page.

I consider posting something public in response to an email against Netiquette. Next time respond in an email if I send you an email and you have a problem with it. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Livxtrm (talk • contribs).

I did not nominate it for speedy deletion. That was done by someone else entirely. I only processed the nomination based on the information provided. Since then, I have restored your previous two edits to the article, so that point is really moot now.

As for the email, you imply above that you don't want me to post the email here, so unless you state clearly that you want me to post it, I won't. However, there is nothing wrong with replying here (as I always do for anyone who writes an email to me from here and doesn't indicate it's private). If you want a reply from me, please post here as I will almost never reply via email to anyone here as I don't see any reason to keep the conversation in email.

The "be civil" was due to your assuming you knew my opinion of the article in question, when you clearly didn't (as I indicated above). I apologize if you thought I was implying anything else. ···日本穣^{? · Talk to Nihonjoe} 23:54, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Baltimore Museum of Industry

A tag has been placed on Baltimore Museum of Industry, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. If you plan to add more material to the article, I advise you to do so immediately. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources which verify their content. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Rmky87 03:24, 20 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of BareXML

The article BareXML has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable software package. External links lead to various listings of software in open source distributions, but no sources that provide significant coverage.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 11:41, 18 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]