User talk:Livingmegler

Your submission at Articles for creation: Susan Anderson (October 21)

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Susan Anderson.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! —Anne Delong (talk) 05:02, 21 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Livingmegler, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!

Your submission at Articles for creation: Susan Anderson (December 8)

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Susan Anderson.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! ES &L 17:17, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at AfC abandonment (emotional) was accepted

abandonment (emotional), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

AioftheStorm (talk) 22:49, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The article looks really good. I was scared at first that we might have already had an article on the subject, and that somehow the two articles would have to be merged, fortunately that was not that case. The article still needs other articles linking to it so that people can find it. Nice work :) AioftheStorm (talk) 23:00, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

References

Please use high quality references per WP:MEDRS such as review articles or major textbooks. Note that review articles are NOT the same as peer reviewed articles. A good place to find medical sources is TRIP database Thanks.

Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 23:25, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Also please do not add many links within a single article to the article you have created. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 23:28, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A belated welcome!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Livingmegler. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! Valfontis (talk) 21:51, 4 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at AfC Livingmegler/Brookfield, Washington was accepted

Livingmegler/Brookfield, Washington, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

j⚛e decker ^talk 19:58, 11 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Susan Anderson (June 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Susan Anderson.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!

Please remember to link to the submission!

You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

TheQ Editor (Talk) 20:57, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Susan Anderson concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Susan Anderson, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:30, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Susan Anderson

Hello Livingmegler. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Susan Anderson".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Susan Anderson}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 02:00, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your undeletion request

Hey Livingmegler. I have a very tangentially related question to your undeletion request WP:REFUND (which I just took care of). I saw that you posted your request twice. This is so common there that it has got to be something about the interface that causes a common confusion, resulting in duplicate requests (we see triple requests too and not in-often). So I was just wondering if there was anything you could identify about how that happened; can you think back to see what you did that resulted in that; what was confusing, where in the process it went wrong; if there was one specific trigger or maybe what we could change to address whatever it is. You may have no idea, and that's fine. I'm just looking for information since this has been a somewhat mysterious issue for those of us who frequent that page. Best regards--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 03:33, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Susan Anderson (psychotherapist) has been accepted

Susan Anderson (psychotherapist), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

—Anne Delong (talk) 04:54, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

About self-references

Dear Livingmegler: I saw your edit summary about the draft article Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Susan Anderson. I am the one who left the message asking for independent sources. However, the message was left in October 2013. I looked in the page history, and at the time the message was left, the only references in included in the article were two pages on the outer child website and one reference to one of Ms. Anderson's publications. Since then, quite a few more references have been added. All of the comments and other review items are deleted when the article is accepted.

Please consider that Wikipedia articles are supposed to be summaries of what has been written about a subject (in this case a person) by other published authors and journalists, not what they have said about themselves. In this way they are different from autobiographies or essays. A notable person may say and write many, many things in his or her life, but the items that should end up in an encyclopedia article are the ones that were significant enough that they were written about by others. I've accepted the draft because it includes enough independent sources to show that it's about a notable person. However, the information that is supported by Ms. Anderson's own publications or web sites remains a problem, and if no independent sources can be found for it, it should be removed. There appear to be plenty of authors writing about her. For example, I found a book in which her five stages were described, and replaced a reference to her book with that one. If the primary references remain, when the editors who assess pages check it, the page will be tagged a banner asking for them to replaced with third party sources.

Thanks for taking the time to improve the article.—Anne Delong (talk) 06:01, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notability Tag

Hello FireFly67, some time ago you added a notability tag to an article I submitted, title=Susan_Anderson_(psychotherapist). I have added additional references. Could you please take a look at the article again and remove the tag if the notability standard has now been met? Thank you. Livingmegler (talk) 01:07, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) At a glance I'm not sure those additional sources help much. You now have multiple sources for the same statements, but on the other hand, entire paragraphs still don't cite any sources at all - and those seem to be the paragraphs that actually focus on Anderson herself, not her work. And while I haven't checked them all, I don't think many of the sources discuss Anderson in any detail. For example, this source gives one quote and doesn't say more about Anderson than that she was the author of that quote. Huon (talk) 01:24, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I am concerned that the additional resources are more "padding" than substantiation - many don't substantiate the material they are referencing. Before removing the banners, please check with an admin.
Wiki-psyc (talk) 23:49, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

February 2016

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at Talk:Susan Anderson (psychotherapist). Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Misspelling other editors' usernames to turn them into insults is not OK, and even you should see the irony of complaining about slander while referring to someone else as a "psycho" in the same comment. Huon (talk) 16:28, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

On an unrelated note, I don't think it's slander to assume you have a close connection to the article's topic when you seem to have access to non-public information about her. Huon (talk) 16:30, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Susan Anderson (psychotherapist)

The article Susan Anderson (psychotherapist) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails notability guidelines at WP:ANYBIO, tagged as such since 2015. She had a couple of interviews when her book came out but my search for other news sources comes up short.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ifnord (talk) 14:20, 19 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]