User talk:Livelikemusicc

June 2015

Your username

You have chosen a username that too closely resembles an established user. The relevant policy can be found at WP:Username policy. Before editing further you should immediately request another username or simply abandon this account and choose another name. Please do not make any more edits with this username. I will watchlist this page in the event you have any questions. Tiderolls 21:50, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I forgot the link to the name change page: Wikipedia:Changing username. Tiderolls 21:58, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

June 2015

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bbb23 (talk) 00:14, 30 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Livelikemusicc (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I feel attacked. I am accused of sockpuppetry over ONE edit? How is this fair. Moreover, my statement has a valid reference, BILLBOARD'S WEBSITE. It is valid and correct but because one user decides to accuse of me of it , I am blocked indefinitely? May I know how this is fair?!Users who are blocked are asked to use this as a chance to reflect, an opportunity to show their understanding and ability to act responsibly, and a period of time to let the matter pass and be learned from. My edits have been properly sourced and referenced and I do not see how my block is justified Livelikemusicc (talk)

Decline reason:

The merit of your edits has nothing to do with the reason for your block: sockpuppetry. And no, that's not due to a single edit but due to a technical match that needs to be addressed in order for unblock requests to have any chance of going anywhere. As of blocking time, indefinitely is how we block sockpuppets because persons behind them already have another, primary account and all their unblock requests shoud be made from them. Max Semenik (talk) 18:54, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I've reformatted your request so that it will show up in the correct category. Otherwise, no one would have seen the request unless they were watchlisting your user talk. Having said that I'd like to advise you that your request will probably be denied as written. It's best you delete this request, read WP:GAB and try a more compliant request. Tiderolls 17:27, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]