User talk:Littlebluenick

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Littlebluenick, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially what you did for SQL. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! maclean (talk) 01:24, 17 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Dia Compe.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Bonkers The Clown (Nonsensical Babble) 11:51, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Dia Compe concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Dia Compe, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 18:04, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Dia Compe

Hello Littlebluenick. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Dia Compe".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Dia Compe}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 16:00, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Local Map of Woolwich.png listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Local Map of Woolwich.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 11:21, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Local Map of Woolwich.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Local Map of Woolwich.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 00:41, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

October 2024

Hi there - Wikipedia relies on reliable sources to verify information, especially about living people. You didn't provide a source for your changes to the James Ward-Prowse article, and I couldn't find one either. If you have a reliable source please let me know and we can change the article. Please let me know if you have any questions. Giant Snowman 15:41, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

really? I got it from the paragraph below about his playing style, which did have a reference. I think it is such an important part of his game that it should be in the top paragraph. Don't you? Littlebluenick (talk) 17:50, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There really is a hell of a lot of gumph in that article and I am really disappointed that you thought what I said was "contentious", and that you did not read the rest of the article for reference. I quote ". Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous."

You did not need to remove my simple sentence that added actual value to the first paragraph. The crap about his children's names and what people "think of him" is a waste of space, yet you decided what I said was contentious. I will return it with a very simple source and I urge you to consider the purpose of an encyclopedia. Littlebluenick (talk) 17:44, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]