User talk:Lithistman/Harkness system

Good enough

@Unitanode: Isn't that already good enough? Put it to the articles' section. -- Adherent of the Enlightenment 10.0 (talk) 06:49, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, but I don't think so -- at least not yet. I'm wanting to expand it a bit, before placing it in article space. Unit Anode 07:05, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe state also the mathematical correlation of that thing. And then also mention other systems....-- Adherent of the Enlightenment 10.0 (talk) 11:12, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Those are some good ideas. Why don't you see if you can find an online reference for some text to that effect, and place it in the article work-up? Unit Anode 11:19, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I confess that topic is not my (favourite field). But I will see, when I have more time (and the will :D). But you must be patient. It can take some time. -- Adherent of the Enlightenment 10.0 (talk) 11:33, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, please don't feel obligated. If chess isn't your thing, you should sign up for a WikiProject about some subject area that is more to your liking. There are WikiProjects on all manner of subjects. Unit Anode 12:03, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I really encourage you, to put that as a regular article. I saw much worse drafts already, yours is good enough. -- Adherent of the Enlightenment 10.0 (talk) 11:17, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm busy in real life today, but I may work on it some tonight, and then place it in the mainspace. Unit Anode 14:03, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]