User talk:Liteditor

Please do not keep undoing other people's edits without discussing them first. This is considered impolite and unproductive. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia under the three-revert rule, which states that nobody may revert an article to a previous version more than three times in 24 hours. (Note: this also means editing the page to reinsert an old edit. If the effect of your actions is to revert back, it qualifies as a revert.) Thank you.--Avery W. Krouse 20:43, 22 February 2006 (UTC) Welcome![reply]

Hello, Liteditor, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --Ugur Basak 12:25, 22 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your recent edits at New Formalism. Please review Wikipedia's NPOV policy before making further edits concerning POV. Please also check the talk page on that article for more about its future. Thanks! --Avery W. Krouse 20:06, 22 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ezra Pound

Hi, liteditor. I have reverted your removal of Torrey's argument about Pound being coddled by the superintendent of St. Elizabeth's for being "Mussolini's propagandist". I don't quite understand why you removed it, as it was, if anything, unusually fully referenced inline, with both an immediate mention of Torrey and, a couple of sentences later, a complete bibliographical reference to the article in which Torrey argues the case. It doesn't matter if it's "POV" or not, as the POV is not that of the article, but is clearly ascribed to a reputable source. Bishonen | ノート 12:05, 25 February 2006 (UTC).[reply]

Leo Yankevich

Please do not call my request for verifiable references "vandalism" - see WP:NPA! As you are going against the sprit of WP:AUTO and ignoring WP:V, it might be sensible to leave the article and let someone find verifiable references for your claims. 89.241.175.151 (talk) 00:21, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The information as to your being the author is quite clearly recorded on the licensing and upload information of Image:Alliance_College.JPG. RedNsign (talk) 03:08, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia's Law of Unintended Consequences

If you write in Wikipedia about yourself, your group, your company, or your pet idea, once the article is created, you have no right to control its content, and no right to delete it outside our normal channels. Content is not deleted just because somebody doesn't like it. Any editor may add material to or remove material from the article within the terms of our content policies. If there is anything publicly available on a topic that you would not want included in an article, it will probably find its way there eventually. More than one user has created an article only to find himself presented in a poor light long-term by other editors.

In addition, if your article is found not to be worthy of inclusion in the first place, it will be deleted, as per our deletion policies, and if you edit war to try and obtain a version of your choosing you may have your editing access removed, perhaps permanently.

Therefore, don't create promotional or other articles lightly, especially on subjects you care about.

89.241.224.125 (talk) 14:22, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Leoyankevich.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Leoyankevich.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 04:08, 14 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Alliance College.JPG listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Alliance College.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 23:53, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]