User talk:Lise Hereford

Lise Hereford, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Lise Hereford! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like ChamithN (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:12, 12 April 2020 (UTC)

April 2020

Your recent bold edit has been reverted. Per the bold, revert, discuss cycle, after a bold edit is reverted, the status quo should remain while a discussion is started instead of edit-warring, and it should be resolved before reinstating the edit, after a needed consensus is formed to keep it. --John B123 (talk) 21:17, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

whom?

Thanks for that, I will add the sources shortly.Billybostickson (talk) 21:28, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

April 2020 - 2

Your recent bold edit has been reverted. Per the bold, revert, discuss cycle, after a bold edit is reverted, the status quo should remain while a discussion is started instead of edit-warring, and it should be resolved before reinstating the edit, after a needed consensus is formed to keep it. --John B123 (talk) 22:36, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Singapore

I put back the content about sex-trafficking in Singapore that you removed. There is no indication of WP:OR despite your claim in your edit summary, and the content is sourced. If you feel it should not be in the article, please begin a discussion at Talk:Singapore and gain consensus for its removal. Schazjmd (talk) 23:07, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Jusdafax. I noticed that in this edit to East Asian cultural sphere, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Jusdafax (talk) 10:57, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of Ineedtostopforgetting (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · logs · block log · arb · rfc · lta · SPI · cuwiki) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 13:36, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]