User talk:Lisa Grace

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Lisa Grace (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I only made one edit that I thought followed the rules. I saw that the area was later shut down due to "massive puppetry". I don't think that my comment would have been blocked on its own. I will not engage knowingly in any more "puppetry". Lisa Grace (talk) 9:27 pm, Yesterday (UTC+1)

Decline reason:

"A friend informed me..." In other words, you were editing at the behest of another user, as part of a co-ordinated attack. That is not permitted here, and we treat such infractions as though they were one user with multiple accounts. Yunshui 雲‍水 08:33, 25 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

As you are one of several accounts who have each made only one edit, specifically to this page, perhaps you would like to explain how it was that you came to this specific page? When answering, bear in mind that this is a checkuser block, which means that there is technical evidence to support the decision to block.--Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 20:42, 24 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A friend informed me of some misinformation that had surfaced on the Wikipedia page of someone I know personally. I was attempting to discourage the promotion of additions to his biographical data that are biased and misleading. These additions are not made by an objective third party, but by someone with a negative agenda. I was hoping to help truth prevail, but I clearly don't know how the game is played like the original editor does.Lisa Grace (talk) 21:17, 24 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a suspected sock puppet of Aphoristofold (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not. If this is a sock puppet account, and your original account is blocked, please also note that banned or blocked users are not allowed to edit Wikipedia; if you are banned, all edits under this account may be reverted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. -- DQ (ʞlɐʇ) 02:34, 25 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]