User talk:Lisa Bathgate

Welcome!

Hello, Lisa Bathgate, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!--Mishae (talk) 13:50, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

July 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to A.K.A. (album) may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

}}}}

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 03:03, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Lisa_Bathgate reported by User:Livelikemusic (Result: ). Thank you. livelikemusic ^{my talk page!} 14:54, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Lisa. According to the report at WP:AN3#User:Lisa Bathgate reported by User:Livelikemusic (Result: ) you have reverted four times in 24 hours at A.K.A. (album), which puts you at risk of a block. It would be to your advantage to respond to the report and promise to make no more changes until you have got a talk page consensus. EdJohnston (talk) 16:48, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you are not intending any response to the 3RR, an admin may proceed with the block. I see you have continued to change the genre language in Unapologetic even after the above notice. Genre is subject to consensus and is not just your personal opinion. EdJohnston (talk) 14:48, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism against consensus

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Unapologetic. Because you have been warned repeatedly about this specifically, this is your final warning. Dan56 (talk) 06:09, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Genre warring

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring, as you did at A.K.A. (album). Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

The full report of this case is at this 3RR report (permalink). EdJohnston (talk) 17:24, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

This account has been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Lisa Bathgate. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you're welcome to make useful contributions. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Dennis Brown | 2¢ | WER 21:13, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Creating those other accounts is clearly socking. I've been exceedingly generous by blocking you one month here, I suggest you accept that in good faith and come back in Aug. with a better attitude. Your next block is likely to be for an indefinite period of time. Dennis Brown | 2¢ | WER 21:24, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Actually it was MariaJaydHicky's. 183.171.183.217 (talk) 18:32, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]