User talk:LisaH91
| This user is a student editor in Wikipedia:Wiki_Ed/Northeastern_Illinois_University/Introduction_to_LGBTQ_Studies_(Fall_2017). Student assignments should always be carried out using a course page set up by the instructor. It is usually best to develop assignments in your sandbox. After evaluation, the additions may go on to become a Wikipedia article or be published in an existing article. |
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, LisaH91, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Shalor and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.
I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.
Handouts
|
|---|
Additional Resources
|
|
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 15:56, 28 September 2017 (UTC)
Peer Review by Leslie
[edit]Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you? Everything was an easy guide to read through. There was a comma after the "or" part which can be deleted.
Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
The article appears to be informative and gave clarification. It seems as though the edit was fixing grammatical errors in the section.
Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? I feel as though it is underrepresented because it did not give a lot of insight of queering the section.
Check the citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article? Citations were good. Active and links and does relate back to the topic.
Is each fact supported by an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted? Yes. It relates back to different ISBN's provided. The information comes from reliable sources. There are neutral sources and no bias notes.
Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that should be added?
The information was edited, therefore, I do recommend more queering — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lptoled2 (talk • contribs) 03:15, 30 November 2018 (UTC)
Hi Leslie, thank you for your peer review. I think that we could have elaborated a bit more on some of the queer aspects of the Kama Sutra -- looking back at it, I noted there were some things that I had forgotten to mention and wanted to add to it. As Sarah and I mentioned in class, someone clearly beat us to the punch! Thanks so much for the feedback.LisaH91 (talk) 01:37, 6 December 2018 (UTC)