User talk:Lisa290

Lisa290, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Lisa290! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Masumrezarock100 (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:03, 10 August 2019 (UTC)

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Lisa290 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

What the hell is wrong with the wikipedia administrators????,,before joining wikipedia, i had carefully read each and every guideline given by the wikipedia and then joined wikipedia,,,,i joined wikipedia because i'm a great fan of hindi television series and wanted to be one the best television series editors in wikipedia and i have never edited any of the articles for any personal gains. This is really too much and absolutely discouraging for any new wikipedia user like me who held high hopes from this platform. I had always respected all the rules and regulations given by wikipedia thoroughly through all my edits and never indulged in any edit wars,,,I really have no idea,,,who the heck is Shiwam Kumar Sriwastaw (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · logs · block log · arb · rfc · lta · SPI ^confirmed _suspected) & Lisamol (talk · contribs),,,This would be absolutely unjust from the part of the administrators to judge me to be one of their sock puppets just because i hold a similar username or i have similar edits.To mark my words,,,the wikipedia adminstration system shoud have carried out proper and advanced investigation before suspecting me to be one of their sock puppets and blocking me. I find it also absolutely indefensible from the the administrator NinjaRobotPirate to have blocked me without prior notice nor warning and without any proper justification. I hope there should be some just action atleast from other wikipedia administrators who know all the rules to block a user. I don't know how to give the proofs but i do have the proofs that i'm not a SOCK PUPPET,,,because i come from a university where my ip address is shared by many and many who make similar edits,,,so just having a similar ip address and making similar edits is absolutely illogical reason to block a user. I kindly request the wikipedia administration team to take a complete proper investigation on my behalf,,and if proved gulity then i have no objections against blocking me,,,but if not which i'm very sure that i'm not guilty,,,,i want legitimate actions against the adminstrator who blocked me without proper reasons

Decline reason:

This is a blatant lie; you admitted to this being a lie further down this page. As such, there are no grounds for lifting the block. You have admitted this is indeed a sockpuppet account evading the previous block on Lisamol, despite trying hard to mislead us here by falsely claiming you have no idea who Lisamol is. Talk page access revoked, no need to engage in any further discussion here. You aren't eligible for unblock consideration here. Yamla (talk) 11:10, 26 August 2019 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

--Lisa290 (talk) 05:06, 26 August 2019 (UTC)Lisa 290

unblock discussion

The overlap is compelling.-- Deepfriedokra 05:49, 26 August 2019 (UTC)

A word to the wise-- you might want to remove words like "legal" and "criminal". Please read and heed the WP:GAB.-- Deepfriedokra 06:02, 26 August 2019 (UTC)

• • • • Fine Sir,,, i will change the terms,,,but i hope you go through my request thoroughly and take needful actions.

--Lisa290 (talk) 06:42, 26 August 2019 (UTC)Lisamol

This is a CheckUser block, meaning it can only be reviewed by a CheckUser(who are even more limited in number than administrators). It also means there is technical evidence of the use of multiple accounts. I would suggest, however, that you tone down your request("what the hell is wrong....."). 331dot (talk) 07:30, 26 August 2019 (UTC)

I have to say that I find it a little suspicious that Lisa290 signed the above message as "Lisamol". NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 07:41, 26 August 2019 (UTC)

Lisa. May I call you Lisa? Lisa, I think you've missed the point entirely that if you are the same person as Lisamol, then editing with this account is block evasion and sock puppetry. And there is your explanation for the block.-- Deepfriedokra 07:48, 26 August 2019 (UTC)

Unblock

{{Yes Sir, i'm the same user as Lisamol but my earlier account was also blocked on suspect of being a SOCK PUPPET of SHIWAM KUMAR SHRIVASTAV by the same careless administratorNinjaRobotPirate,,, i guess the role of administrator is for a purpose and i also think that the account of any user should not be blocked just on suspect and doubt. It was so distressing to see all the articles on which i had complete research information from TNN, Hindu, Indian Express and so on being deleted ruthelessly, i had already explained why i had joined wikipedia and also mentioned i have no personal benefits,,,and the administrator who so called beleives that i'm a sock puppet of SHIWAM KUMAR SHRIVASTAV did not carry out any proper investigations before blocking my accounts. Moreover i had already read that it not wrong to hold multiple accounts in wikipedia but it is wrong to use them for illicit purposes. So how can i be blocked to hold to two different accounts when even before creating the second account, i had been extra careful with all the rules and regulations of wikipedia, never indulged in any edit wars nor edited any articles without proper resources,,,if you are really an true administrator Deepfriedokra,,,then you have to first go through all the edits made by Lisa290 and all the articles created byLisamol and then decide whether i'm a sock puppet of SHIWAM KUMAR SHRIVASTAV. I had not created any articles with my second account because i don't want repeat any mistakes i had made being Lisamol. Let me repeat once again,,,i don't know who the heck is SHIWAM KUMAR SHRIVASTAV??? and that is why i used the term criminal for the administrator who has blocked my account twice without any proper warning or innvestigation. I had also gone through the articles of SOCK PUPPETRY in wikipedia where all the administrators have clearly notified that THERE IS NOT NEED TO WORRY IF YOU ARE NOT A SOCK PUPPET and i'm not a SOCK PUPPET of whosoever SHIWAM KUMAR SHRIVASTAV, then why do i have explain and request everytime to unblock my account, i find it rather careless from the admiistration team of wikipedia who just finds fault with any new user without proper investigations,,,this is absolutely wrong and very very discouraging for a new user like me who joined wikipedia thinking it to be a public platform to share knowledge.}}

--Lisa290 (talk) 09:15, 26 August 2019 (UTC)Lisa290

You just said that you have no idea who Lisamol is, and it was unjust to block you because you have a similar username to her. So now you say that you are Lisamol, but you're not Shiwam Kumar Sriwastaw? OK. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 09:21, 26 August 2019 (UTC)