User talk:Lireksta01

Hi

Welcome!

Hello, Lireksta01, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Addhoc 15:15, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

John Templeton Foundation article

According to Wikipedia:Verifiability:

1. Articles should contain only material that has been published by reputable sources.

2. Editors adding new material to an article should cite a reputable source, or it may be challenged or removed by any editor.

3. The obligation to provide a reputable source lies with the editors wishing to include the material, not on those seeking to remove it.

In this context, you are completely justified in removing material that lacks appropriate citations. Thanks for raising this, Addhoc 15:19, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You have done nothing but repeatedly delete content that your boss, the VP of the JTF has told you to hide. Please stop now and inform your boss that this is not an appropriate request. Sdedeo (tips) 21:39, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Virtually all the deletions have been of material not supported by citations. In this context, accusations of vandalism are misplaced. Addhoc 22:09, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No, the single deletion has been of the list of conservative people that have received foundation grants. It has happened many, many times; the source appears twice in the article; once in the references and now once after the sentence in question. Sdedeo (tips) 22:12, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I agree with your earlier comment, we should be discussing this on the talk page. However, I am confident that accusations of vandalism are misplaced. Addhoc 22:17, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]