On a final note, you may want to consider joining a WikiProject of interest to you. WikiProjects gather editors interested in certain topic areas, providing them with information, tools and a place to discuss the topic in question. For a list of all WikiProjects, see here. Joining a WikiProject makes the Wikipedia experience much richer! Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me08:03, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
What you say is total nonsense and you want to delete my contribution by saying these nonsenses. I objected the use on unencyclopedic source on the article of Auschwitz, you don't have any answer for my objection and instead you delete what I wrote in the talk page of that article! Simply ridiculous.--Liopaiopsm (talk) 16:40, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
And by the way, the article has 121 citations, and I can't find any that are to the Simon Wiesenthal Center (as you claimed). Also, the article's talk page is for discussing proposed changes to the article text, not promoting debunked Holocaust denial tropes, or distasteful speculation on / joking about hundreds of thousands of dead Jews who will come back to life. Again, read WP:NOTAFORUM. If you want to propose a specific article change based on reliable sources, then you can use the Talk: page for that. If you just want to argue about whether or not or how many Jews were killed at Auschwitz, and continue to ignore WP:NOTAFORUM, then you will undoubtedly get blocked. Jayjg (talk)16:54, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
YOU are the one who is doing disruptive edits not me! If you can reply to my questions do it, if you can not then don't bother. Search better and you will find where Simon Wiesenthal has been used as a source in the article.--Liopaiopsm (talk) 19:08, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]