User talk:Lionsdenprod

January 2020

Hello, Lionsdenprod, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as RobenX (talk · contribs). Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. GPL93 (talk) 12:33, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Lionsdenprod/sandbox

A tag has been placed on your user page, User:Lionsdenprod/sandbox, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be advertising which only promotes or publicises someone or something. Promotional editing of any kind is not permitted, whether it be promotion of a person, company, product, group, service, belief, or anything else. This is a violation of our policies regarding acceptable use of user pages — user pages are intended for active editors of Wikipedia to communicate with one another as part of the process of creating encyclopedic content, and should not be mistaken for free webhosting resources or advertising space. Please read the guidelines on spam, the guidelines on user pages, and, especially, our FAQ for Organizations.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 14:32, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

January 2020

There have been two problems with this account: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group or a web site, which is also against policy, as an account must be for just one person. Because of those problems, the account has been blocked indefinitely from editing. Additionally, if you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for your contributions to Wikipedia, you must disclose who is paying you to edit.

If you intend to make useful contributions about some topic other than your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In that reason, you must:

Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block. To do so, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page, replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason for thinking that the block was an error, and publish the page. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 14:37, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Lionsdenprod (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

memphismusic (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

Hello, I truly intend to make useful contributions to the page. I must be honest I thought I could save the page and edit more at a later time. I am not looking to promote a specific product but to only offer information about an music artist who I feel deserves a wiki page. I modeled the page after another artist that is currently on wikipedia simply because I wanted to make sure I had the correct format. If I need to have all the grammar correct before uploading then that is fine. I was just under the impression that I could continue to edit and then ask for the page to be reviewed once all edits were completed. I created the second page because I figured the previous page had been deleted since it was named after the artist. That is my mistake. I understand that this is an informational platform and not a promotional one. I only want to submit an article worthy of being viewed on your website. The contributions I plan to make are entertainment based. This is my first article of a young man doing great things for anti bullying and albinism awareness and I wanted see if your site thought his story would be worthy of adding

Decline reason:

"Memphis Music" is the name of at least one business per a Google search, so you will need to make another choice. You wrote a completely unsourced draft which I assume is about one of your clients. Looking at its content, he may meet the Wikipedia definition of a notable musician if the information can be properly cited to independent reliable sources- but you have a conflict of interest and paid editing relationship, so you shouldn't be the one to write about him. Since you only seem to want to write about this musician and other things within your conflict of interest, there are no grounds to lift the block, and I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 11:02, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]