User talk:Lionheartpike
Katheryn Edmonds Rajnak
[edit]Hi,
I did review Katheryn Edmonds Rajnak, but that does not mean that I changed anything. What it means is that I checked it was not a copyright violation, was not a hoax, and was suitable to be included in Wikipedia. You can see this in the logs for me Special:Log/Graeme_Bartlett, or the log entries for the page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Log?type=&user=&page=Katheryn+Edmonds+Rajnak&wpdate=&tagfilter=&wpfilters%5B%5D=newusers. Once reviewed it allows robots to check the page, and that allows Google or Bing to index it. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 04:36, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
The article Katheryn Edmonds Rajnak has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (biographies) requirement. WP:BEFORE did not reveal any significant coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 09:29, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Katheryn Edmonds Rajnak for deletion
[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Katheryn Edmonds Rajnak is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Katheryn Edmonds Rajnak until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 10:53, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
December 2020
[edit]
Hi Lionheartpike! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Katheryn Edmonds Rajnak that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. Kj cheetham (talk) 11:45, 17 December 2020 (UTC)