User talk:Lionfox0909

Welcome!

Hello, Lionfox0909! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Peaceray (talk) 18:44, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Introduction • Contributing to Wikipedia • Your first article The five pillars of Wikipedia • Simplified ruleset How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Get help at the Teahouse Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions Department directory Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Verifiability • No original research Reliable sources • Citing sources • Content guidelines What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style (Simplified) • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sockpuppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists The Signpost (Wikipedia's newspaper)
Things to do
Task Center • Be bold in editing Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Copy editing • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguation • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Peaceray (talk) 18:44, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Query

Hello, Lionfox0909,

It's unusual that a 2 day old registered account on Wikipedia would find themselves in the Articles for Deletion discussion area, arguing whether articles should be kept or deleted, talking about "independent sources" and referring to GNG. Did you edit previously with a different account? This is not what most 2 day old accounts do unless they are very familiar with the project side of Wikipedia from editing extensively in the past with other accounts. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:59, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

i learned wikipedia editing from my elder brother so now i opened my own account and started editing in wikipedia thank you Lionfox0909 (talk) 17:31, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Well, you may want to learn more. For example, you may want to see WP:NOQUORUM. I think this is the first time I've see a reverse WP:BRO. Muhandes (talk) 15:52, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry sir my mistake Lionfox0909 (talk) 15:58, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Well, it looks like I was right and you were just a sockpuppet. Too bad. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:38, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

Hello! Lionfox0909, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:59, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Why are you adding PROD and Notability tags?

Hello @Liz, I mentioned you here because you already notice this account adding PRODs, and disrupting the Articles. They added both tags on Shujaat Ali Quadri (activist), i think he didn't know the Guidelines that is why they are adding. Thank You ----- Bishtt Solanki (talk) 17:29, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reading the Page clearly shows that Shujaat Ali Quadri is being promoted WP:BIO. All articles are almost PR fail WP:GNG. He is not a Notable Person. In Journalism, he did not do any notable work that would prove his notability. Lionfox0909 (talk) 18:17, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Lionfox0909, Sir you are a new user, first of all read about All Notability Guidelines. Thank You. ----- Bishtt Solanki (talk) 20:18, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

respected @Liz Mam I am definitely a new user but I read Shujaat Ali Quadri is page completely and after reading 19 news links carefully it came to know that out of this, about 17 news have been written by Shujaat Ali Quadri himself, of which he is the editor and the two news links are those also do not proof Shujaat Ali Quadri notable. 🦁 Lionfox 🏹 0909 (talk) 17:04, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unsourced categories

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons. Thank you. Please do not add categories that are not supported by reliably-sourced article content. See WP:BLPCAT.-- Ponyo^{bons mots} 18:05, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@User:Ponyo my mistake After today I will take full care of this. 🦁 Lionfox 🏹 0909 (talk) 19:11, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Vivek Verma (musician) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Vivek Verma (musician) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vivek Verma (musician) (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

SpeakNeak (talk) 07:53, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Rafika Nurtazina

Hi there!

Thank you for adding some categories to the article, but please don't edit articles which have a tag on top of them that they are being actively edited, like this

This article is actively undergoing a major edit for a short while. To help avoid edit conflicts, please do not edit this page while this message is displayed.

This page was last edited at 19:22, 29 October 2022 (UTC) (0 seconds ago) – this estimate is cached, update. Please remove this template if this page hasn't been edited for a significant time. If you are the editor who added this template, please be sure to remove it or replace it with {{Under construction}} between editing sessions.

I am currently editing the article and the edit conflicts take a lot of time to resolve.

I'd really appreciate that.

Thank you! Less Unless (talk) 19:33, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thankyou sir, i don't edit in this page. 🦁 Lionfox 🏹 0909 (talk) 19:35, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

November 2022

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Bbb23 (talk) 16:21, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Lionfox0909 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Respected sir, I started editing Wikipedia from October 20 and I was editing in Wikipedia without any greed every day whenever I got time, whether it is to correct someone's article or discussion in ADF, I gave full support and I gave 3 pages Create in which there were two temples and one musicians about whom I came to know through google and article I researched about these three subjects and I thought that these three subjects are noteworthy and their pages should be made I create their pages in future Who created this page in the first place, maybe reliable sources did not exist at that time, but when I rejected I felt that all those reliable sources are available which should be according to Wikipedia's guideline Wikipedia never says that you can use them. Can't recreate page but you connected me to USER:Vivek.k.Verma under sockpuppet I never know such user in future you can check my ip address can check my location i am pretty sure that never my ip address my location that user Because I don't know that user I'm pretty sure you'll listen to me and unblock me so that I can honestly contribute to Wikipedia in future and I'll always do my work honestly as till now I am doing thank you. 🦁 Lionfox 🏹 0909 (talk) 18:19, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This appeal is virtually indecipherable. As the is the English encycopedia, a certain level of proficiency is expected to contribute here. Regardless, it is not a coincidence when a new user comes here and immediately edits/creates the same articles that are tied to paid editing and promotion. Ponyo^{bons mots} 19:05, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Lionfox0909 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

@Ponyo You said that I did paid editing do you have any proof of this and where in wikipedia it is written that a new editor cannot create the page and you gave me the region of the block USER:Vivek.k.Verma with Show that do you have any such proof to prove that I have any connection with USER:Vivek.k.Verma account. If you have read my created page then I made 2 temple pages do you think someone will make temple pages with money or will someone give money to editor to make temple page does anyone promote god too 🦁 Lionfox 🏹 0909 (talk) 19:49, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This is incoherent. Yamla (talk) 13:22, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Lionfox0909: If you read Ponyo's comments accurately, you would see that it said it is not a coincidence when a new user comes here and immediately edits/creates the same articles that are tied to paid editing and promotion. Whether or not you are currently getting paid or not is irrelevant. Also, you asked where in wikipedia it is written that a new editor cannot create the page. In fact, only editors who do not have the WP:AUTOCONFIRM role cannot create an article, unless an creation of a specific article name has been blocked, or the editor themself has been blocked.

You would have done well to read some of the links in the Welcome to Wikipedia message that I posted for you. Peaceray (talk) 20:50, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]