User talk:Linspark
Your submission at Articles for creation: Alison Appleton (May 20)
[edit]
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Draft:Alison Appleton.
- To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the .
contributions to Wikipedia!
- Please remember to link to the submission!
- You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.
|
Hello! Linspark,
I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! JustBerry (talk) 21:28, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
|
Your submission at Articles for creation: Draft:Alison Appleton (June 9)
[edit]Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Alison Appleton.
- To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the .
contributions to Wikipedia!
- Please remember to link to the submission!
- You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Welcome!
[edit]
Hello, Linspark, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:
- Introduction
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- How to write a great article
- Simplified Manual of Style
- Your first article
- Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
- And feel free to make test edits in the sandbox.
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to leave me a message or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. We're so glad you're here! Anastasia (talk) 00:22, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Ref: Alison Appleton draft declined
[edit]Hello Anastasia
I am new here, so I hope you can help me. It's my second attempt at writing this article. I do know that it's subject is notable and has been the subject of inclusions in national media here in the UK and Ireland, but I am clearly getting something wrong.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Alison_Appleton
If I delete the citations which refer to Whittards, Twinings and La Cafetiere in the reference section, while leaving the body copy that refers to them, would that sort things out?
I thought these associations with fairly major corporations (in their fields) added to her notability.
I really want to get this right and would welcome your advice.
Thank you for your time
Linspark (talk) 07:28, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
- Thank you for contacting me, Linspark! I'm happy to be of assistance :) Perhaps I didn't explain the problem properly. Sorry for any confusion I might have caused you. Your submission is about a notable person who is definitely worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, and your sources are acceptable. This is the problem: Although the text says many things which would make her notable, some of these things do not have sources to back them up.
- For example, the fact that Alison Appleton's works have "been featured in British newspapers such as the Daily Mail, Sunday Express, Sunday Times and Yorkshire Post, and in magazines including Ideal Home, Good Homes, House Beautiful, Shortlist, The English Home and Period Ideas" makes her notable, but, since there are no sources backing it up, the reader has know way of knowing whether this statement is true or not. A source is needed for this and all statements which do something to establish Appleton's notability. See Wikipedia:The answer to life, the universe, and everything
- However, for the statement that "[Appleton's] designs are influenced by a wide range of sources, from eighteenth century chinoiserie to fairy tales", a cited source (although encouraged) is not required, because this statement is not a quote and does not establish her notability. For nonessential facts like these, primary sources can also be cited.
- So, to get your submission accepted, you should make sure all of the important facts which make Appleton notable are backed up with reliable sources. Don't be afraid to cite some primary sources, such as the Whittard one, for the nonessential details. Another thing I might suggest to improve the submission would be to remove all in-text external links, or move them to the bottom of the page to the "External links" section, per Wikipedia:External links (although this will not affect the article submission process, it will improve the layout of the article)
- I know all of Wikipedia's policies and guidelines can be confusing (and frustrating) to navigate, so I want to thank you for persevering and contributing despite setbacks :) Did I answer your question correctly? Is there anything else you would like to know? ~ Anastasia (talk) 19:42, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Dear Anastasia
You are BEYOND helpful! I am so appreciate of your detailed email - I don't think I'd have got there on my own and the first reviewer didn't reply to my query.
I think I have revised the piece in line with all your recommendations. I didn't cite the list of publications because her presence in some of them consists of just product listings and pictures. That said, I now understand and appreciate your point about establishing notability.
This is my first time on Wikipedia and I do hope I have it right now. It's actually hugely encouraging that the approval process is this rigorous and has this much integrity.
Fingers very crossed - and have a nice evening
Best wishes
Linsey
Linspark (talk) 16:31, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
- My pleasure! By the way, to correctly leave talkback on someone's talk page, type in {{talkback|Linspark}}. That should fix any formatting problems. I was happy to be of service, and if you have any more problems, don't hesitate to ask :) Ciao! ~ Anastasia (talk) 16:53, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Draft:Alison Appleton (June 26)
[edit]Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
.
- To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the .
contributions to Wikipedia!
- Please remember to link to the submission!
- You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Your submission at Articles for creation: Alison Appleton has been accepted
[edit]
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
ThaddeusB (talk) 01:09, 1 July 2014 (UTC)