User talk:LinsErik

August 2023

Hello, I'm Cabrils. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Lazarus (software) seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Cabrils (talk) 07:52, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Cabrilis,

thanks for the feedback. However, not sure why my edit has been considered "less than neutral". I just added a new application example which was implemented with Lazarus. It's hosted on github and is open source, there definitely is no commercial interest involved. If it was just about my english wording (I'm not a native speaker...) feel free to let me know what could be done better.

Thanks, ER!K LinsErik (talk) 08:23, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I now see that most/all other projects clearly say these are open source, which I didn't. Was that the reason? No problem, as said, it's open source (MIT license) on github. LinsErik (talk) 08:32, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: NAppGUI (January 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Deltaspace42 was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Current sources are not independent.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:NAppGUI and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Deltaspace⁴² (talk • contribs) 16:57, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, LinsErik! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Deltaspace⁴² (talk • contribs) 16:57, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:NAppGUI

Hello, LinsErik. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:NAppGUI, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:07, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]